metaphysical possibility

Metaphysical possibility is possibility – there is no distinction. I use the word metaphysical to emphasize the fact that the real includes and is much greater than the given… and that the given is fluid, mutable and mutating, psychological rather than logical

The idea of metaphysical possibility may employ metaphysical systems but does not endorse any given metaphysical system.

Much further info can be found at:

http://horizons-2000.org/5.%20Mind%20and%20Metaphysics/words,%20language,%20m...

The mind arises into a higher plane of Pure Self,... into regions of Light...
or into planes where it feels an infinite Power or a divine Presence...

I'm sure you understand by now that continual thought backed by strong emotion is a potent recipe for creation. The only thing is, you are creating negatively--things you DON'T want. Learn to break the habit--better yet, learn to change this habit of thinking of what you don't want, to remind you to think of what you do.

Changing this ONE HABIT can literally change your life around. Get all the help you can. Check out Lee Milteer's program to Break Any Habit in 21 Days. Her program is guaranteed--you have nothing to
lose! Oh, except that old worry habit that's sabotaging your creating consciously. Make the change today! You can learn more about Lee's program, as well as get my booklet on Everyday Manifesting and Beyond, where I tell what my worry had created, by visiting:

http://www.creatingconsciously.com


It really can change for you! If you make the effort, it will!
Till next time,
Apryl Jensen
CreatingConsciously.com

EverydayManifesting.com

Aprylian Originals

Creating Money Beyond Belief


4097 Devonshire, Provo, UT 84604, USA

In the metaphysics of Principia Cybernetica, there is no need to posit the existence of a personal God, as an all-powerful, intelligent agent which governs the universe but which is external to it. Indeed, the role of God as creator and director of the universe is taken over by self-organizing evolution. On the other hand, if such an agent with the traditional attributes of omnipotence, omniscience and perfect goodness would be posited, this would lead to logical inconsistencies. There are many arguments supporting this conclusion.

However, this still leaves open a few philosophical positions. Which position you prefer is more a matter of taste than a matter of logic, since they seem equivalent in most practical respects. The simplest one is atheism, which assumes that there is no God, and thus no need to think about the concept. A more subtle approach is pantheism, where the word God is redefined and is equated with the universe and nature. In this spirit of pantheism, God might be seen as the highest level of control in the Universe. God is for the Universe what human will is for the human body. Natural laws are one of the manifestations of God's will. Another manifest- ation is the evolution of the Universe: the Evolution. Finally, there is the "intermediate" -- position of agnosticism, which simply assumes that we don't know whether God exists, since none of the existing arguments can prove that God either exists or does not exist.