
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>

<title><![CDATA[Irreverend Mike's Blog]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Babblings from an Irreverent Mike]]></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:30:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Root of all Evil? (even more Dawkinsiana)]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=30</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>From an <a href="http://www.ffrf.org/timely/dawkins.php">essay written not long after September 11th</a>&nbsp;, that's well heeded now in these days of (literally) cartoon violence:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>How can I say that religion is to blame? Do I really imagine that, when a terrorist kills, he is motivated by a theological disagreement with his victim? Do I really think the Northern Ireland pub bomber says to himself "Take that, Tridentine Transubstantiationist bastards!" Of course I don't think anything of the kind. Theology is the last thing on the minds of such people. They are not killing because of religion itself, but because of political grievances, often justified. They are killing because the other lot killed their fathers. Or because the other lot drove their great grandfathers off their land. Or because the other lot oppressed our lot economically for centuries. </p>
<p>My point is not that religion itself is the motivation for wars, murders and terrorist attacks, but that religion is the principal <em>label,</em> and the most dangerous one, by which a "they" as opposed to a "we" can be identified at all. I am not even claiming that religion is the only label by which we identify the victims of our prejudice. There's also skin color, language, and social class. But often, as in Northern Ireland, these don't apply and religion is the only divisive label around. Even when it is not alone, religion is nearly always an incendiary ingredient in the mix as well. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:30:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dawkins in a Nutshell]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=29</link>
<description><![CDATA[<div>From <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/03/AR2006020300822_pf.html">today's Washington Post</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp; </div>
<blockquote style="">
<div>Understanding the pitiless ways of natural selection is precisely what can make humans moral, Dawkins said. It is human agency, human rationality and human law that can create a world more compassionate than nature, not a religious view that falsely sees the universe as fundamentally good and benevolent. That is why, Dawkins said, he donates to disaster relief efforts -- work that is "un-Darwinian" -- and why he is a stickler for human laws, even the unimportant ones: When riding his bicycle, he stops at red lights even when there are no traffic and police officers present.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><strong>"I am a passionate Darwinian when it comes to explaining how things are, but I am an even more passionate anti-Darwinian when it comes to politics," said Dawkins, who comes close to describing himself as a pacifist. "Let us understand Darwinism so we can walk in the opposite direction when it comes to setting up society."</strong></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div></blockquote>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tolerance != Relativism]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=28</link>
<description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Austin Dacey <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/03/opinion/03dacey.html">nails it in the Times</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp; </div>
<blockquote>
<div><em>What Pope Benedict calls relativism are actually the values of secular liberalism: individual autonomy, equal rights and freedom of conscience. But it is easy to conflate what liberals affirm with the way they affirm it. Liberalism tells us that our way of life is up to us (within limits), not that the truth of liberalism is up to us. <strong>It entails that we tolerate even claims that we doubt, not that we doubt even the claims of tolerance. Many liberals themselves are guilty of this confusion, which can manifest as all-values-are-equal relativism</strong> (especially common among freshmen in ethics classes, at least until the instructor informs them that because all grades are equally valid, everyone will be receiving a D for the course).</em></div></blockquote>
<div>I'm sick of battling both right and left about this issue.&nbsp; Tolerance and unquestioning acceptance are two different things entirely.&nbsp; </div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[God as Abusive, Jealous Spouse]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=27</link>
<description><![CDATA[Once again, Austin Cline from atheism.about.com beat me to the punch.&nbsp; As someone who's joked that if the Christian God existed he'd be a good candidate for regime change, you must read <a href="http://atheism.about.com/od/whatisgod/p/AbuserAbusive.htm?nl=1">this post about how this flavor of God resembles an abusive spouse</a>&nbsp;.&nbsp; Good stuff.&nbsp; ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Santa Claus -- Good Training for Skeptics?]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=26</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have a confession to make. I've been peddling nonsense to my four-year-old  daughter. <br />
<br />
Nonsense, thy name is "Santa Claus." Thanks to you, Santa, I  lie to my child every day. <br />
<br />
I lay the initial blame on my wife. She  insisted we maintain the Santa tradition in our household, citing the joy and  wonder this brought her as a child. I made the standard counterarguments about  the bad habit of lying to one's children and the potential sense of hurt when  she realizes we'd been misleading her all of her life. Of course, these  arguments exited my mouth and spilled to the earth unheeded. <br />
<br />
I thought  I'd regret losing this battle. Now I'm not sure I do. <br />
<br />
The first reason  seems shameful. Gracie is too young to fight the Santa wars at daycare, and I  for one don't want to face the inevitable lynch mob of parents after Grace  proclaims to her daycare playmates that Santa doesn't exist and her daddy told  her so. So call me a coward.<br />
<br />
The second reason seems cruel but  understandable. When my wife mentioned the "joy and wonder" of Santa Claus, it  rang bells. Indeed, I remember the "joy and wonder" of belief in Santa Claus. I  also remember the "joy and wonder" of believing in a Christian god. It took me  years to realize how much I learned from my own Santa experience. <br />
<br />
Santa  taught me: <ul><li>That I would go through all kinds of mental gymnastics to believe in Him </li><li>That everything was OK with the world after I realized He didn't  exist.</li></ul>Turns out, those were important lessons to learn before losing  my belief in God. <br />
<br />
The third reason is more heartening. My daughter, I  discovered last night, is no brainless automaton, sucking in Santa without  skepticism. When recounting a recent "Breakfast With Santa" occasion, she said,  "all of my favorite characters were there: Rudolph, Strawberry Shortcake, Elmo,  and Santa Claus." <br />
<br />
My wife and I blinked. "Is Santa Claus a character?"  She replied, "Yes." <br />
<br />
Thinking she might not know that "character" meant  "fictional," my asked her if there was a real Santa at the North Pole, or was he  like a pretend character on TV. She said "he's a character." When she saw the  surprised look on our faces  , she apparently thought she'd made a mistake and  backpedaled a bit. <br />
<br />
I'm not 100% sure how to read this incident, but it's  in keeping with her character. Though she loves stories, movies, and fantasy,  she never ever mistakes these for reality. When I asked her if one of her  stuffed animals was sad about something, she stated, "he's just a toy." (She was  only 3 at the time.) <br />
<br />
I swear that we've never forced this way of  thinking on her, and it makes me re-think some stereotypes about childhood. We  assume that kids are predisposed to wonder, and we define "childlike" as being  adorably credulous. But my daughter has managed to disprove this to me. I  respect her all the more!<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top 10 Signs You&#39;re a Fundamentalist Christian]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=22</link>
<description><![CDATA[<font face="Courier New">(Can't take credit for this -- it was emailed to me.)&nbsp; <br />
<br />
10 - You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
9 - You feel insulted and 'dehumanized' when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that we were created from dirt.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
8 - You laugh at polytheists but you have no problem believing in a Triune God. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
7 - Your face turns purple when you hear of the 'atrocities' attributed to Allah but you don't even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the babies of Egypt in Exodus and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in Joshua including women, children, and trees! <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
6 - You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods sleeping with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god who got killed came back to life and then ascended into the sky. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5 - You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of Earth (few billion years)but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is a few generations old. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4 - You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs -- though excluding those in all rival sects - will spend Eternity in an infinite Hell of Suffering.&nbsp; And yet consider your religion the most 'tolerant' and 'loving.' <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
3 - While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics&nbsp; have failed to convince you otherwise some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in 'tongues' may be all the evidence you need to prove Christianity. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 - You define 0.01% as a 'high success rate' when it comes to answered prayers.&nbsp; You consider that to be evidence that prayer works.&nbsp; And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 - You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself a Christian.</font><br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Descent of Man]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=21</link>
<description><![CDATA[<div align="left"><a href="http://billmon.org/archives/002069.html">Whiskey Bar</a>&nbsp;on Bush's kiss-up to "Intelligent Design"&nbsp;activism:</div>
<center>&nbsp;</center>
<center><img height="175" alt="descent.jpg" width="500" border="0" src="http://billmon.org/archives/descent.jpg" alt="Image" /></center>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Choice Douglas Adams Quote]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=20</link>
<description><![CDATA[From <a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/001086.html">Panda's Thumb:</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin-left:40px; ">It’s rather like a puddle waking up one morning— I know they don’t normally do  this, but allow me, I’m a science fiction writer— A puddle wakes up one morning  and thinks: “This is a very interesting world I find myself in. It fits me very  neatly. In fact it fits me so neatly… I mean really precise isn’t it?… It must  have been made to have me in it.” And the sun rises, and it’s continuing to  narrate this story about how this hole must have been made to have him in it.  And as the sun rises, and gradually the puddle is shrinking and shrinking and  shrinking— and by the time the puddle ceases to exist, it’s still thinking— it’s  still trapped in this idea that— that the hole was there for it. And if we think  that the world is here for us we will continue to destroy it in the way that we  have been destroying it, because we think that we can do no harm.</div> ]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[&quot;How horrible!  Click to Buy!&quot;]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=19</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591">Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries -- Helpfully provided by Human Events Online</a>.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Love how they slam the books, but helpfully provide clickable links to buy them at Amazon.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Except for the obvious choices (Hitler, Mao, etc.), that's a helluva reading list!&nbsp; (Comte, here I come...)<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 19:29:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[&quot;Can I be God for a Little While?&quot;]]></title>
<link>http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-GPa2ghszcqQwxHZW71IUVDUfymsnNR6Jog--?cq=1&amp;p=18</link>
<description><![CDATA[Paul Feig (of <a href="http://www.freaksandgeeks.com/">Freaks and Geeks</a> fame) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/paul-feig/can-i-be-god-for-a-little_1909.html">wants to be God for a little while.&nbsp;  What say we let him?</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin-left:40px; "> <p>But the point is always the same. God does things that fly completely in the face of what we've all been taught that He is supposed to do and everytime He does this, we all just say, "Oh, well, I guess there must be some good reason why He did that." </p>
<p>And THAT'S what I want to be able to have people say about me.  Can you imagine how great it would be? <br />
<br />
"Why didn't Paul pick us up at the airport?  He said he would."  <br />
"Well, he must have his reasons. Even though the cab ride is going to cost us a fortune, don't get mad at him. It's not for us to know why he didn't show up."</p>
<p>"Paul burned our house down.  Why would he do such a thing?"<br />
"Well, it doesn't make sense to me but he wouldn't do it unless he thought it was going to be a good thing for us. We actually should thank him."</p>
<p>It's foolproof. No matter what you do, people not only let you get away with it, they attach deep meaning to whatever you did, no matter how bad it was. Or, if it's really really bad, they just convince themselves that you didn't know about it or that it wasn't your fault or that the people to whom the terrible thing happened must have somehow deserved it.</p>
<p>And that's why I'd like to be God for a little while. If for no other reason than to have a little time off from people being mad at me for not returning their calls, not emailing them back, or not reading their screenplays.</p>
</div>  ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>

<!-- up1.mgl.re2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Oct  7 12:55:53 PDT 2008 -->
