Yahoo! 360° News | Beta Feedback
Start your own Yahoo! 360° page

worldspelledbackwards

Top Page  |  Blog  |  Friends  |  Lists

  • School: University Of California At Berkeley

Add

worldspelledbackwards is not connected to you in Yahoo! 360°.

Last updated Sat Oct 04, 2008 Member since June 2005

Tag Cloud

Biting my fingernails before the election. I am supporting Obama and the word is McCain s campaign is about to turn real dirty. Reply

1 - 5 of 193 First | < Prev | Next > | Last

T H E W O R L D S P E L L E D B A C K W A R D S Full Post View | List View

This is my thinking zoo: elephant thoughts, mouse thoughts and thoughts in between. Bring your gerbils and giraffes.

Why Political Garbage at the End of the Campaign?
Why Political Garbage at the End of the Campaign? magnify
Why has the election become so dirty with lies? Obama has never "palled" with a sixties bomber (see the New York Times full story that Palin misquoted). McCain doesn't want to take medical care away from the young an poor (though he does want to make it more expensive).
The answer is fear.
The answer is evolution.
Living things survive by evolving alertness to dangers in their environment. If they weren't alert, they'd be dead. Cross any city intersection and you know what I mean. Looking for and processing danger signals is a lot of what humans, do.
If you're running an electoral campaign, you take advantage of alertness for dangers by emphasizing dangers-coming from the opponent.
Look, there's about 8 percent of likely voters still undecided (see Real Clear Politics). How to 1. grab their attention? 2. make them want to vote against the other guy? Asking them to vote for yourself (Obama or McCain) is a calm, rational thing to do. Asking them to vote against the other guy involves giving reasons to dislike, be scared of, fear the other guy. It wakes up the slumbering undecideds. Thus, negative advertising, thus the dirt and lies.
The final 8 percent of undecideds are, I'm guessing, people who have problems focusing or deciding-or, they have spouses, parents and in-laws pulling in different directions. You need a blockbuster to grab their attention and move them. Thus the screaming about Obama palling with bombers and McCain wanting to keep you sick.
Is there any way to keep elections from getting down and dirty at the end?
I think not. To grab the last trickle of undecideds you unfortunately need to scream.
For those of you who have decided, please tune out the garbage and stick with your decision.
Tags: campaign, obama, mccain, undecided, fear, evolution, garbage, lies
Monday October 6, 2008 - 03:18pm (PDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
A Peek into the Future of Afghanistan October 04, 2008
The following is taken from the AP (click on the headline for the article). This is diplomatic reality at its most profound and secret. This is the kind of thing that Bush hears-or maybe his people are afraid to tell it to him. Or Cheney deletes it with his magic marker.

UK official: Taliban part of Afghan solution

By JILL LAWLESS, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 3 minutes ago

Although Britain and its NATO allies are engaged in a fierce campaign against Taliban militants

in Afghanistan, British officials have voiced interest in trying to talk the Taliban into laying down their arms and joining the government.

On Saturday, the British government denied a claim that the U.K. believes the military campaign in Afghanistan is doomed to failure, after a French newspaper reported that London's ambassador to Kabul had said foreign troops added to the country's woes.

France's weekly Le Canard Enchaine published on Wednesday what it said was a leaked French diplomatic cable recounting talks between Britain's Ambassador Sherard Cowper-Coles and a French official.

The newspaper said the French cable reported that Cowper-Coles had said Afghanistan might best be "governed by an acceptable dictator" and that the cable quoted him as saying foreign troops were adding to the country's problems by helping shore up a failing government in Kabul.

Cowper-Coles was quoted as saying that "the American strategy is destined to fail" and that the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan was "part of the problem, not the solution."

The prospect of a dictatorship "is the only realistic one and we must get public opinion ready to accept it," the report quotes the alleged cable as saying.

The newspaper, a weekly publication known for its investigative stories, published excerpts of the cable, including a passage that quoted the British ambassador as criticizing both U.S. presidential candidates over pledges to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.

"It is the American presidential candidates who must be dissuaded from getting further bogged down in Afghanistan," an extract of the cable published by the newspaper quoted Cowper-Coles as saying.

The newspaper said it had obtained a copy of the two-page cable, which it reported was sent from Kabul to Paris on Sept. 2. It said the cable was written by France's deputy ambassador in Afghanistan, Jean-Francois Fitou, following his meeting with Cowper-Coles.

Saturday October 4, 2008 - 05:54pm (PDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Hello, Again. October 04, 2008
Hello, Again. October 04, 2008 magnify
It's been more than a year since I've posted. I've been working on a writing project and building a website related to my writing. I thought I'd re-introduce myself and my other websites with this photo I couldn't resist. For more about the photo, see below.

My two websites are:
www.jeffersoninparis.com
This website is connected with my writing an historical mystery with Jefferson as a protagonist during the time he was Ambassador to France, specifically in the year 1786.
www.harlanlewin.com
This, personal website if for political and cultural commentary.
Also, I just joined Facebook, if any of you is on that.

About the above photograph:
The girls in the photo are intense as is their nun teacher. (Click on the photo to enlarge it.) Perhaps the photo took a lot longer than today's do and they were told to sit perfectly still. Someone wrote that the photo had to be before 1904 because after that this particular village school was only for boys (the writer didn't say where the girls went-but being France, I'm sure they had another school). The change had something to do with French schools no longer being run by the Church. The village is Glux near Autun in the mid south of France in the beautiful region of Burgundy. The site is:

Tags: school, france, glux, photo, schoolgirls, burgundy
Saturday October 4, 2008 - 04:20pm (PDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Entry for July 10, 2007
Entry for July 10, 2007 magnify
Well, I just bought a laptop and the following thoughts occur to me:

1. Life has become too complicated and it is impossible for a non-specialist to really know what he's doing when buying computer equipment.

2. Salespeople are perfect strangers who pretend to be your friend. Even ones who may mean well are often themselves amateurs in knowing about what they sell. Especially since everything changes so rapidly.

3. It is ridiculous to shell out so much money for something that you know will either die within four years or become obsolete. The manufacturers are hell-bent to create new gimmicks in order that the old ones become obsolete.

4. I have enough computing power in my low-end machine to run a small city. Where can I get the hundred dollar machine that has been created for the less-developed nations? It's probably all I need since I am not a gamer or a video addict.

5. I am going to copyright my name for the current generation (actually for the last two generations). A name like generation X or the Lost Generation. My new title is the Toy Generation. Our new toys that tumble out from the manufacturers every day are distractions from the depth and quality of life. As well as from the major questions of life. If anyone asks me how it is possible that the U.S. spends twelve billion dollars a month (see below) two wars-Iraq and Afghanistan-I think one answer is, people aren't seriously thinking about it or what to do about it. They are too involved with a. playing with toys and b. finding the money to buy new toys.


Associated Press
Report: War Costing US $12B a Month
By ANDREW TAYLOR 07.09.07, 3:58 PM ET

The boost in troop levels in Iraq has increased the cost of war there and in Afghanistan to $12 billion a month, and the total for Iraq alone is nearing a half-trillion dollars, congressional analysts say.

All told, Congress has appropriated $610 billion in war-related money since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror assaults, roughly the same as the war in Vietnam. Iraq alone has cost $450 billion.

The figures come from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, which provides research and analysis to lawmakers.

Tags: computer, iraq
Tuesday July 10, 2007 - 08:39am (PDT) Permanent Link | 2 Comments
Invest in Europe
Invest in Europe magnify
If (if,if,if) I had a lot of money to risk, I think I'd start investing in Europe. There are two new major governments, France and the U.K. (I don't know anything about the minor governments, but I did see an ad in the Wall Street Journal for Moldavia which leads me to think there is hope for that poorest of European states.)

Though I'm still fairly suspicious of Sarkozy, I am reasonably happy that he's pushing hard for the European Constitution and that he is strongly criticizing the U.S. for not working with other willing countries to reduce global warming.

What little I've seen about Gordon Brown in the U.K. reassures me that he's very experienced and has some good European values. Maybe better than Blair's. However, I have heard that he is a big, big Americanophile and comes here every year for vacation (maybe to balance off Blair's going to the Dordogne in France, which I rather more approve of). I think Brown is limited in what changes he can make early on due to the conservatism of the British socialists (similar to the American Democrats, though less so). And he's limited by the perceived need to keep good ties with the U.S. (I wonder if the U.K. thinks of itself as the tail wagging the U.S. dog, but I guess that would require even more ego that the Brits can manage.)

By the way, I saw an astounding discussion on the French channel I get here (TV5). There's a French author who has just published a book about the French fascination with England. (In the 18th Century, even while they were fighting the British in the 1770s, the French were adoring of English culture, liberties, and gardens.) (Sorry, I don't know why I'm doing so m any parentheses tonight. I think it might have something to do with the chocolate I'm eating.)

But, to continue, the above author said that the French were absolutely fascinated and admiring! of the Brits for their a. dynamic economy, b. free lifestyle and c. self-assuredness (compared to chronic and profound French self-doubt, which, by the way, endears them to me because I find self-doubt a much better road to wisdom and truth than a big ego). My experience, especially in the southwest of France is that the "bifteks" English are rather well detested for their icy natures. And also because they are buying and building so many homes around where Blair spends his summers. (Well, that's another story, since the French government has made property inheritance rules such a disaster for its own citizens.)

When my friends in France want to be particularly nasty to me (as a masochist I love the French sense of humor) they call me a (horrors!) Anglo-Saxon. Since, I'm slavic, Jewish, middle-eastern, Mediterranean and god knows what else in my mongrel American DNA I kind of like being labeled an Anglo-Saxon. It's so neat and perfunctory and creates a nice clean, though completely fanciful, box for me.

On the other hand, I suppose I am Anglo-Saxon in the way the French mean it. I don't have the passion and spontaneity of and Italian, a Spaniard or a Frenchman. Well, of course, that's why I go to France; hoping that some of that will rub off on me.

I have a feeling that the above author's book refers to his friends in the first and 17th Arrondisements of France, maybe somewhere around Parc Monceau. That's fitting, since that Parc was created by one of the greatest Anglophiles of the second half of the 18th century (he didn't make it into the 19th century having caught a sore throat from a steel blade). I'm speaking of that despicable libertine and pretentious pretender, Louis-Philippe, duc d'Orleans, cousin of Louis XIV (for whose own sore throat from steel he voted-what goes around comes around). That duc's passion was not only for London bordellos but even more so for London horse racing, which he initiated in his own France. But I think, perhaps its the Bobos around Parc Monceau that are the Anglophiles in France and not the villagers around the Dordogne where the British were finally kicked out of the country in 1453.

Anyway, I would invest in Europe if I had the money. But more basic than that, I am desperate to see a strong and united Europe (with a less obtrusive Poland in its mix). With its 400 plus million people and its smarts and innovations it could play the most important role in the world. What is that role? Obviously, to counterbalance to the United States, whose anachronistic self-image of leader of the world (or at least some imagined and self-defined "free world" or even more magical "western world") has been uncovered for all to see in a most embarrassing way by our emperor with no clothes, George Bush. Isn't it obvious that even the "conservatives" in Europe are pushing for human rights, social nets and environmental responsibility, while the rest of the great powers like China, India, and the U.S., fail in all three areas.

Have an excellent weekend!
Tags: europe, sarkozy, anglo_saxon
Friday June 29, 2007 - 11:14pm (PDT) Permanent Link | 1 Comment

Add T H E W O R L D S P E L L E D B A C K W A R D S to your personalized My Yahoo! page:

Add to My Yahoo!RSS About My Yahoo! & RSS
1 - 5 of 193 First | < Prev | Next > | Last