I found an interesting interview with comics author Mark Waid in which he says some interesting things about how he comes up with his stories:"But when I write, I start with the hero’s internal conflict first. What does he want? What’s in his way? What’s going on inside his head? If there’s a villain who can help me externalize that, swell."
That makes sense, and it's useful to know to understand how to read Waid's comics. But....I worry that it makes the hero's storyline too allegorical, maybe even solipsistic. Doesn't that sound like the way Grey's Anatomy comes up with the medical issue for each episode? 1) Figure out what the doctor's are going through; 2) introduce said issue as a medical metaphor.It's neat, it's tidy, it shows good craftmanship -- and yet it seems false. (If I were one of the supervillains, how would I feel knowing I'm only a tool to explore the hero's personal issues?) Now, if Waid simply means that he uses villains to create the internal conflict for the hero, then I'm okay with that. But if he's simply using villains to externalize a hero's emotional or mental state, then I worry that the story is overly-crafted. Movie reviewers sometimes complain that characters feel plot-driven more than organically created, and I worry that this is the danger of Waid's approach. Still, interesting food for thought on how to write these kinds of stories.....