Yahoo! 360° News | Beta Feedback
Start your own Yahoo! 360° page

Kelly

Top Page  |  Blog  |  Feeds  |  Friends  |  Lists  |  Groups

Add

Kelly is not connected to you in Yahoo! 360°.

Last updated Wed Jan 03, 2007 Member since December 2006

I am just an advertisement for a version of myself.--> Click here

1 - 3 of 3 First | < Prev | Next > | Last

Kelly's Blog Full Post View | List View

This and that rattles around in my bean.

Entry for January 16, 2007
Entry for January 16, 2007 magnify

Yugas, the eschaton and singularities

The odd person or two who skimmed my last two blog entries may have gotten the mistaken impression that I'm suggesting some political course of action. Nothing could be further from the truth. I wuz jus shootin da sheet, blowin off steam, as it were. I have no interest in convincing anybody of anything, or trying to push, coax or cajole ponderous political bodies to move this way or that. Just making observations..

I'm busy in practical endeavors, in this yugal bardo. Actually, the Kali Yuga is not scheduled to end for another 300 years. Near the end, supposedly, lives get shorter and shorter, until at the very end, they are only seconds long, nano-seconds, then everything atomizes. There is a gap, and then a new golden age starts. This doesn't sync up with the Mayan calendar and the 2012 cult. But these are just maps, more or less accurate.

Ray Kurzweil in his book the Singularity has made modern maps, which chart the course of exponential technological development, a trend traced not only all through history, but throughout life on earth, and even throughout phenomenal development during the life of the "universe." There is no intrinsic demarcation between "organic" and "artificial" technology. It's all "natural." Space, atoms, molecules, life...all an unbroken continuity.

Moore's law, it's no secret. Those who think it will plateau lack imagination. One need only eat a mushroom to grok the implications. I get a giggle every time I hear projections of demographics over the next 50 or more years, when they are based on backward looking trends, and fail to take this radical acceleration into account. Where will people live, what will they eat, how much money will they have, in 50 years? People?

Loren Eiseley, in his beautiful book Immense Journey, looks at life as a continuous phenomena, over billions of years. Thou art that. We are those primordial cells that first learned to split and have sex. And all that followed and came before. Remember? We will. Archeology will advance into a science of mind. We will piece together the continuity of experience, of consciousness. The warp and weft of incarnation.

The weave of self and relationship, constantly rearranging..the pregnancy of history, the contractions of the eschaton..this is our context, Terrence McKenna's Hyperborea, which is itself a fractal reflection of its context. As above so below. All phenomenal elements holographically inter-reflect. God created man in Her image. So, weird and exciting times indeed. Like Henry Miller, I welcome the end of history. It's been a rough phase.

To loose track of these contextual issues is to misconstrue political, psychological and economic events, which could lead to bad business decisions. The poverty and suffering of history has been varied and horrible, but not necessarily more horrible than the always changing types of suffering that came for billions of years before history.

There is a Buddhist saying: Samsara (suffering) has no beginning, but it has an end. Nirvana (enlightenment, bliss) has a beginning, but it has no end. Historical forms of suffering have been novel, like sparks flying off the machine grinding out ever increasing standards of living. We are nearing the end of that grind, the flashpoint in which standards of living unimagined through all time, and even today, will wash over all sentience, across space and time.

Tags: yugas, eschaton, singularity, 2012
Tuesday January 16, 2007 - 05:01pm (PST) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Entry for January 15, 2007
Entry for January 15, 2007 magnify

Kryptonite and the Peacock


On June 6, 2005, my health suddenly crashed. One day I was superman, the next I was at death's door.

I was a health fanatic when I crashed. That same avidity for health optimization was turned to recovery modalities and understanding etiologies in complex systemic and syndrome type diagnoses.

I'm pretty comprehensive in research and experimentation. This has led not only through the forest of pharmaceuticals, herbals, and into the mountains of chi gung, but beyond, into the integrative dimensions of lifestyle and it's psycho-spiritual interface with organismic functionality.

Since I have a history of Buddhist aspirations, including a sincere Bodhisattva vow (the intention to alleviate all types of suffering, among other types of well-wishing), the result has been to drive me to develop business platforms for advancing health, and improving life in other ways.

The peacock in the title comes from a famous story for describing the types of Buddhism. In the story, there is a tree with poisonous fruit, and a village gets concerned about it. They have an argument what to do about it. (The poison is usually considered to be desire, or the cause of suffering.)

1. Someone suggests they cut the tree down. This is supposed to represent Teravadan Buddhism. The problem being that the tree can grow back.

2. Someone suggests they dig out the root. This is Mahayana Buddhism.

3. Someone says, "but the fruit can be used to make medicine." This is the alchemical, transformative Tantric, or Vajrayana Buddhism.

4. Meanwhile, a peacock lands in the tree, eats the fruit, and spreads it's feathers. It's fine. This represents Dzogchen. It transcends in an instant the duality of poison and health.

I'm pretty much stuck in level three, trying to use my experiences with ill health in a transformative way to improve health for myself and the world, between which I recognize a feedback loop.

Tags: health, tantra, transformation, buddhism
Monday January 15, 2007 - 11:35pm (PST) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Entry for January 12, 2007
Entry for January 12, 2007 magnify

My Religion

The ism that best describes my religion is animism. I believe, and often perceive, that consciousness and spirit are pervasive, and like sea or space, have currents that form personalities, flowing at various rates. But just as the personality has no absolute or permanent boundaries, animism isn't my only religion.

I wouldn't list the big 3, the monotheist religions, Christianity, Islam or Judaism, because those terms imply a political form of religion. In each case, they have an inner, mystery school version, with which I would identify. I am a Rosicrucian, Sufi and Cabalist. These schools, although distinct, with traditions and forms, ultimately lead to the same end.

My university degree was in Comparative Religions. But the course of study was more than academic. Noel King was my teacher in and beyond school. Another teacher and friend, Amber Jayanti, teaches what she calls Universal Qabala, which incorporates truths from all traditions freely, syncretically, although using a traditional Kabalistic framework as the organizing principal.

Buddhism has always been useful and important to me. Some say Buddhism is not really a religion, but more a system of psychological tools. The term religion means something like the term yoga: to bind the individual to the divine, to open up a channel of communication between the temporal and absolute, or to break down the karmic, or habitual, accretions that interfere with this communion.

God, the divine, for me, is best understood the way Lao Tzu described the Tao. The God that can be talked about is not God. God, divinity, is ubiquitous, beyond duality, and therefore even to say that "all is one," which is God, or that reality is empty, are just terms for where the sidewalk of language ends. Yet, that said, God is absolutely active, intelligent, loving, and graceful. God is the absolute, and in every detail.

The important part of religion is not to describe God, although a definition must be given, since the term refers to so many different memes to different people. Religion has a secular, political side, and a sacred side. The secular side is composed of forms and rituals, dogmas that can be used for political manipulation, but are meant as platforms to access the sacred. The sacred is the evolution of our God given divinity.

I draw no distinctions between sacred, secular and profane, between matter, space and non-duality. These are continuities, where distinctions must be broken down to approach truth. On the other hand, I insist on making a distinction between the outer and inner form of religion (Christianity/Rosicrucianism), because these are important distinctions that are not widely recognized.

Communication with the divine, the purpose and basis of religion, is not different from inter-personal communication, or our relationship with the environment, with animals and plants, rocks and streams, or with the cells and organs in our bodies. Religion is the evolution of the divine that happens through relationships, either between our perceived self and others, or between selves and elements that we host.

If all this seems too wide open and non-specific, and I had to bow to someone else's description of religion (dogma) I would accept the Dalai Lama's definition, "My religion is kindness." In recognition of inter-relatedness, altruism and selfishness become the same thing. Desire is a force, which only flows towards landmarks, but never ends. Religion is the Aikido of improving phenomenal networks to ease this flow through all points.

Tags: religion, animism, rosecrucian
Friday January 12, 2007 - 02:38pm (PST) Permanent Link | 0 Comments

Add Kelly's Blog to your personalized My Yahoo! page:

Add to My Yahoo!RSS About My Yahoo! & RSS
1 - 3 of 3 First | < Prev | Next > | Last