Yahoo! 360° News | Beta Feedback
Start your own Yahoo! 360° page

Jeff H < Y! ID: echotek >

Top Page  |  Blog  |  Feeds  |  Friends  |  Lists

  • Work: Medical Contracting Services
  • School: US Naval School Of Health Sciences

Add

Jeff H is not connected to you in Yahoo! 360°.

Last updated Mon Aug 13, 2007 Member since February 2006

Total Page Views

2,883

Life is what happens when you re busy making other plans. - John Lennon Reply

1 - 5 of 20 First | < Prev | Next > | Last

Jeff H's Blog Full Post View | List View

I'm interested in all things related to nature photography, Beatles and life's finer moments.

Entry for February 01, 2008
Entry for February 01, 2008 magnify

I read a lot of books between the age of 10 to 45, but I've slowed down considerably. One author in particular was a personal favorite...in fact I read every book he wrote...his name was Carl Sagan. Most people will remember him from the award-winning TV series on PBS titled "Cosmos" or the 1997 movie titled "Contact" with Jodie Foster & Matthew McConaughey. Dr. Sagan wrote many books in fiction as well as non-fiction genres. My personal favorite was "A Demon Haunted World". Sadly, we lost this great scientist, author and teacher in 1996 after a lengthy battle against myelodysplasia with bone marrow transplants and finally pneumonia. he was just 62 years old.

In 2006, Ann Druyan (Sagan's widow) published "The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God". This tome is basically a transcript from Dr. Sagan's Gifford lecture series in Glasgow, Scotland 1985. The Gifford lectures were established by the will of Adam Lord Gifford (d. 1887). The lectures were established to "promote and diffuse the study of Natural Theology in the widest sense of the term...in other words, the knowledge of God.

So, being somewhat addicted to Sagan's works, I got a copy of this lecture and I've been reading it, albeit slowly and intimately. I stumbled onto the following quote by Ann Druyan in an interview:

“Carl saw science as a form of spiritual discipline. Science has been the means of weaning ourselves of our childhood delusions of centrality in the universe, which in and of itself has to be considered a great leap forward for us spiritually. He also believed that to love anything or anyone deeply you must be willing to see the object of your love not as you fantasize it or wish it to be, but as it really is. The scientific method enables us to know and therefore to love nature with an unprecedented depth of understanding. The universe that science has revealed is more vast, complex, fascinating and more ancient than our ancestors, including the prophets, ever conceived. The over arching insight of modern science is the relatedness, the oneness of all. For Carl, Darwin’s insight that life evolved over the eons through natural selection was not just better science than Genesis, it also afforded a deeper, more satisfying spiritual experience.”

--Ann Druyan (2006) talking about her husband, scientist & astronomer Carl Sagan

----The Varieties of Scientific Experiences: A Personal View of the Search for God

Tags: carlsagan
Friday February 1, 2008 - 12:25am (EST) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Huge Hole In The Universe
Huge Hole In The Universe magnify

Scientists have discovered a huge hole in our universe; see the article on MSNBC's website:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20415284/

Kinda makes ya go "Hmmm...?" I wonder what's on the other side? This hole is a billion light yrs across and it's not a black hole either, in fact it doesn't even have any dark matter! No planets, no stars, no galaxies..NUTHIN! Just a humungous hole in our universe.

Tags: holeintheuniverse
Friday August 24, 2007 - 08:26am (EDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Blast From The Past!

A recent bout of introspection at midlife has given me cause to contemplate past, present & future. Upon reaching mid-40s, which is a half-way point of life I find myself thinking about the relatively large number of interactions that have come & gone.

There were a small handful of very, special people who vanished totally and I cared for them deeply. This deep sense of caring & compassion makes me wonder how they are doing, are they happy, did they achieve all their dreams & aspirations?

Of course, this analysis and introspection makes me review my own standing. Have I managed to accomplish those goals set forth in adolescence? Do I have enough $$$ saved for retirement? Am I happily married? Is my life moving forward, backward or standing still? Do I have some hidden pathology lurking inside that hasn't revealed itself yet?

I suppose the naysayers in our midst would describe this as a "midlife crisis" but I don't think so....I think it's just a short check before proceeding onward. Let's face it, no matter what happens there are three things that are absolutely certain:

  1. You're born
  2. You will die
  3. You will pay taxes
Tags: midlifepitstop
Friday August 17, 2007 - 03:33pm (EDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Bush and wiretaps in America
Bush and wiretaps in America magnify
Gutless Democrats take easy way out on eavesdropping

THEY CAVED. Not all of them, of course, but enough cowardly Democrats folded to allow President Bush and his fear-mongering allies to ram through legislation that further erodes fundamental American liberties and privacy rights. Apparently, all the Bush Administration has to do to seize more power to conduct new, broader, warrantless wiretapping is to mention terrorism and 9/11 in the same breath and even a Democrat-controlled Congress will capitulate.

Just once I’d like to see some stalwart Democrat, other than Robert Byrd, wag his finger at all the gutless wonders in his party for taking the easy way out. Rather than call the President’s power grab on excessively invasive government surveillance what it is — an end run around our constitutional rights — Democrats gave him exactly what he wanted in greater authority to eavesdrop without a warrant.

The role of a secret national-security court to monitor sensitive government domestic spying operations and issue the necessary warrants for wiretaps was reduced to irrelevancy. That oversight is now in the hands of — gasp — the attorney general and director of national intelligence.

What were Democrats thinking? Are they too afraid of appearing weak on defense to even balk when such an affront on personal liberties is writ large by the President?

The White House said it needed open-ended authority to snoop on international phone calls and e-mails, that might include Americans, as a necessary tool to fend off potential terrorist attacks. And the Democrats bit.

After the Democrat-led Senate and House quickly approved the President’s warrantless wiretapping demands last Friday and Saturday respectively, Mr. Bush signed the bill into law on Sunday. The hurry to get it done was part of the whole drama of urgency the administration had cultivated to bully the feckless lawmakers.

The terrorists were plotting terrible things against the free world, whispered the White House. There wasn’t a minute to lose in gaining unfettered access to certain overseas phone calls, e-mails, and text messages to or from Americans in the United States.

Originally, catching suspected terrorists explained the administration’s push for unrestricted eavesdropping. It had to secretly ignore laws enacted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in order to intercept al-Qaeda without legal impediments. The President simply decided after 9/11 that his administration was above some laws and didn’t need a court-approved warrant before or after government surveillance was initiated.

There was too much at stake with the scheming evildoers to follow established procedures, no matter how accommodating. Frankly, few have ever disputed the need of government to take extraordinary measures to diffuse national security threats.

But curiously, the revised surveillance legislation rushed into law last weekend is not restricted to snooping on suspected terrorists. In fact, there’s no requirement that eavesdropping done on international calls and e-mails, including those with Americans on the line, even involve a caller suspected of terrorist or criminal activity.

The sole requirement for the warrantless wiretapping on foreign communications that might involve Americans is that the surveillance be “directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States.” But what constitutes “reasonable belief” and who will police the intelligence community’s use of that standard?

FISA was enacted precisely to blunt the kind of abuse of power being flaunted by the Bush White House. Previous administrations — the Nixon era comes to mind — notoriously abused the unchecked capability of government to eavesdrop on domestic communications and U.S. citizens.

In the name of national security the powerful have a long history of trampling on civil rights, human rights, and 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. And they get away with it until the checks and balances of government are restored.

There was hope after last fall’s midterm elections that the new Democratic majority on Capitol Hill would restore some equilibrium to government in Washington. Voters trusted the new leadership to challenge the White House on its war policy, on its unilateral interpretation of the law, and on its skillful use of fear to silence critics.

But maybe, as has been suggested, we expected too much from a majority party without the legislative muscle to effectively assert itself with the executive branch. Or perhaps we settled for the same old politics, where getting elected comes first and preventing laws that skirt the rules is a distant second.
Tags: bushandwiretaps
Monday August 13, 2007 - 04:48am (EDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Child Support "American Style"
Child Support "American Style" magnify

If you're reading my BLOG, then chances are you are probably near my age (mid 40s) and you may be able to recall a popular TV show from the late 60s & early 70s...it was called "Love American Style"? This was late night entertainment alternative before the arrival of SNL. The show had a myriad of parody sketches that depicted everything from true romance to carnal lust in all its' silliness.

One of life's greatest mysteries for me is this: How do we go from "I Love You and I want to spend the rest of my life with you" to a more distant "talk to my lawyer, I can't stand being in the same room with you"? I've had this pleasant experience not once, but twice in my lifetime. I was married in 1981 to Bev from WV and we divorced in 1985, then I married again to Sandy from SC in 1988...we divorced in 1994. At one time, I thought I had such deep committment & love that I declared publicly that I'd spend the remainder of my days with these vile wretches. I'm happy to report that at age 46, I can't even remember what they look like anymore.

When a woman announces publicly (legally) that she is splitting, what she's essentially saying is this: "I'm leaving you because I believe I can be better off without you" . I'll be the first to admit that married life is not easy and divorce is so readily available & convenient that it's no wonder that fully 65% marriages end up in divorce court. Here's the part that really burns my ass...they split, take everything with them including the kids and then immediately begin to pursue our checkbooks through legal channels. As a male (father) in the US, nearly 96% of support paying parents are males with less than 2% female and 2% joint. Our over-abundant law offices have forms that are pre-filled with empty spaces to indicate who you wanna screw and how much $$$.

In summary, the real bothersome crime here is the public denouncement when the woman declares "I don't need you anymore; I'm better off on my own" but then she drags us through the court sytem where we are ceaselessly hounded & pursued to near-insanity. if she wants to declare "I don't need you anymore" then she should just go away and leave us alone forever. Sadly, we live in a country that is literally rotting from within, not unlike the end of the Mayan culture or the Roman Empire must've been when they drew near to thier ends. I read an article in USA Today that stated 80% of support paying parents are either in arrears or non-paying. Our jails & prisons have to release criminals early because they are so over-crowded and our court sytem actually imprisons the "dead-beat" dads and real felons get work release & early parole.

So...if you know a support paying father who's struggling...BUY HIM A DRINK (he needs it but probably can't afford it)

Tags: childsupportinus
Thursday August 9, 2007 - 04:35pm (EDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments

Add Jeff H's Blog to your personalized My Yahoo! page:

Add to My Yahoo!RSS About My Yahoo! & RSS
1 - 5 of 20 First | < Prev | Next > | Last