Yahoo! 360° News | Beta Feedback
Start your own Yahoo! 360° page

black

Top Page  |  Blog  |  Feeds  |  Friends  |  Lists

Add

black is not connected to you in Yahoo! 360°.

Last updated Sun Sep 17, 2006 Member since May 2006

"in order to know god you have to know the universe" dogon tribe

1 - 5 of 110 First | < Prev | Next > | Last

black's Blog Full Post View | List View

food for thought.

Affirmative White Preference for Black Immigrants
African America - Black History - U.S.
Wednesday, 21 March 2007

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary

by BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford

AffirmativeActionButton In yet another example of the devolution of affirmative action as actually practiced in the United States, a recent study shows immigrant Blacks are heavily over-represented at elite U.S. universities, relative to African Americans of native background. Despite efforts to focus on supposed cultural failures among African Americans as causes of the imbalance, the real culprit is clear: Whites prefer to elevate Blacks who are perceived as "different" from the home-grown variety. Does the name Barack Obama ring a bell?

Affirmative White Preference for Black Immigrants

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary

by BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford

"Intra-Black differences do not shape the policies of elite universities or corporate head-hunters. White people do."HarvardMassedBlacks

A recent study shows that immigrant Blacks, or the sons and daughters of Black people from the Caribbean, Latin America and Africa, now make up about 25 percent of Black enrollment at Ivy League and other elite universities. This, of course, does not happen by accident. Immigrant Blacks are twice as numerous at the most coveted colleges as their proportion in higher education as a whole.

Which naturally causes me to think of Barack Obama. Why? Because the top-heaviness of immigrant-background Blacks at the most selective universities proves only one thing: that they are preferred by white people over home-grown African Americans - just as Barack Obama has become a superstar because of white preference.

Unfortunately, discussion of the new study's findings tends to center on the supposed failures of Black American culture, failings that are claimed to be so profound that these poor, flawed souls cannot even be accommodated by well-meaning college affirmative action programs. There ARE cultural differences between self-selected Black immigrants, who tend to come from more advantaged backgrounds in their home countries, and the masses of Black people who have been here all along. But intra-Black differences do not shape the policies of elite universities or corporate head-hunters. White people do. And, to paraphrase Kanye West, white Americans don't much like African Americans.

"Affirmative action as largely practiced in the United States simply gives white folks more options."

Immigrant Blacks have always gotten at least a partial pass in white society. Not much of a pass, but enough to get very visibly Black Cubans and Dominicans into white baseball long before Jackie Robinson's entrance into the Big Leagues. What people should be studying is not the relative success of immigrant Blacks in higher education and other rungs on the socioeconomic ladder, but what white people bring to the decision-making process that collectively gives preference to Blacks who appear to be different from the natives - and therefore more prepared for success in a white dominated environment.

Affirmative action, originally a response to Black demands that white society make up for centuries of African American slavery and exclusion, soon devolved into a white people's game of "diversity," in which they could pick and choose among various minorities - and women of all backgrounds. Now they have taken the white preference game into the shrinking corner of affirmative action still reserved for Blacks, and are tilting that playing field in favor of African-descended people of non-U.S. backgrounds. Just as they have anointed Barack Obama a Black leader.

The Black struggle was always about power, not the creation of white dominated committees to elevate selected dark-skinned folks to higher corporate and academic status. Affirmative action as largely practiced in the United States simply gives white folks more options to pick and choose their own favorites - and then call it "progress."

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.mic01

To listen to or download this Black Agenda Radio commentary, click on the mic at left.

To comment on or read what others have to day about this item, click here to visit its page on the Black Agenda Blog.

Monday October 8, 2007 - 02:58pm (CDT) Permanent Link | 2 Comments
Freedom Rider: Ahmadinejad Sane, Bush Crazy
Wednesday, 03 October 2007

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret KimberleyFRBushCrazed

A famous old English song is titled, "The World Turned Upside Down." Such appears to be the insane vantage point through which the Bush regime, and many ordinary citizens, FRIranPrezview reality: in reverse. U.S. media and politicians behave as if they are already at war with Iran, a nation that has been brutalized over generations by Americans, but whose president spoke of world peace and an end to "dark plots" during his visit to this country. Deafened and blinded by arrogant, ignorant, unthinking hatred, Americans responded with venom in quantities toxic to all rational thought. The Poisoner-in-Chief, George Bush, has made great strides in turning much of the nation into a Cuckoo's Nest.

FRBushPraysFreedom Rider: Ahmadinejad Sane, Bush Crazy

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley

"He [Bush] should respect the American people. They should not bug the telephone conversations of their citizens. They should not kill the sons and daughters of the American nation. They should not squander the taxpayers' money and give them to weapons companies. And also help the people, the victims of Katrina. People will vote for them if they do these things." - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran

It would be the height of folly if Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believed for one moment that George W. Bush will ever respect the people, the constitution or the laws of the United States. Bush wants to bug our phones, squander our money and enrich his friends at Halliburton. He will never do anything for the victims of Hurricane Katrina. Bush has done everything he ever wanted to do and he has continued to be successful with the help of the party that should be opposing him.

"New York newspapers competed with one another to see who could drum up more hatred of Ahmadinejad."

George W. Bush twice cheated his way into the oval office. Ahmadinajad was democratically elected. Iran is not at war with any other nation. Bush has occupied Iraq four years ago and is responsible for the deaths of one million people. Despite the clear differences in behavior and morality, the United States Congress has overwhelmingly approved three separate resolutions that will be used to authorize the warlike nation, America, to attack the peaceful nation, Iran.

When both Ahmadinejad and Bush recently spoke at the United Nations, the horrifying truth of America's insanity and evil could not be denied. An alien from another world would have thought that Ahmadinejad was the very personification of human evil. New York newspapers competed with one another to see who could drum up more hatred of Ahmadinejad and twist his words into outright lies. Like the tawdry tabloids, nearly every presidential candidate competed for the right to be the most hateful and openly threaten the lives of the Iranian people.

"America is the country led by crazy, hate filled people."

When Ahmadinejad expressed a desire to lay a wreath at the World Trade Center site he was treated worse than the most common criminal and told to stay away. His expressions of sympathy would have proven inconvenient once American bombs began to fall on his country.

Ahmadinajad's visit proved that America is the country led by crazy, hate filled people. The imminent attack on Iran will not be the first this country has inflicted. Ahmadinajad pointed out as much in a 60 Minutes interview:

"Well, initially, we might have had the impression that American officials want to redeem themselves and the mistakes they have made in the past. Because for eight years they supported Saddam against my nation. Many hundreds of thousands of people were killed. Thousands of people were chemically bombarded. Many people were killed in their own houses. This very city of Tehran was the target of more than 100 missiles. Many people were killed in Tehran. But Saddam was being supported by American officials. So once American officials announced that they were going to deal with Saddam, our first impression was that they're going to make amends for their past behavior."

Making amends is for twelve-step programs, not for empires. Not only will America not make amends to Iran, Iraq or any other nation it has harmed, but it will sink further into a morass of theft and murder whenever it feels the whim or the need. The country that thinks itself moral and superior is in fact the "great satan" that the Ayatollahs railed against:

"What religion, please tell me, tells you as a follower of that religion to occupy another country and kill its people? Please tell me. Does Christianity tell its followers to do that? Judaism, for that matter? Islam, for that matter? What prophet tells you to send 160,000 troops to another country, kill men, women, and children? You just can't wear your religion on your sleeve or just go to church. You should be truthfully religious. Religion tells us all that you should respect the property, the life of different people. Respect human rights. Love your fellow man. And once you hear that a person has been killed, you should be saddened. You shouldn't sit in a room, a dark room, and hatch plots. And because of your plots, many thousands of people are killed."

The so-called madman quite rightly lectured Americans on their claims of religious faith. Bush and his friends are always seated in "dark rooms" hatching plots and too many of their own people support their efforts to keep killing around the world.

"The wisdom and sanity is coming from Iran, the evil and insanity is coming from Washington."

FRAirAttack George W. Bush has brought death to America faster than any foreign country could ever dream. No enemy is necessary when thieves and killers are at the helm of the ship of state. Ahmadinejad's words should serve as a warning because all hell is about to break loose. The wisdom and sanity is coming from Iran, the evil and insanity is coming from Washington, from Republicans and Democrats alike.

If sane people were in charge of our government, then American military defeat would be something to hope for. Yet it is hard to imagine what Bush and Cheney will do at home and abroad if Ahmadinejad is stronger than they think. Because our Congress won't do its constitutionally mandated duty and begin an impeachment investigation, there is nothing that the Bush regime can't get away with. The American people have already lost their constitutional protections and an attack on Iran will only hasten the process. We are about to see just how crazy our leaders are and how sane is the rest of the world.

Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.Com. Ms. Kimberley' maintains an edifying and frequently updated blog at freedomrider.blogspot.com. More of her work is also available at her Black Agenda Report archive page.

Monday October 8, 2007 - 02:53pm (CDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Studies Plumb Depths of Black Maternal Health Woes
Wednesday, 03 October 2007

by Molly M. GintyPregnantMotherAndChild

The stresses of racism contribute mightily to horrendous mortality levels among Black women and infants in the United States, according to a group of studies recently released by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. Black women and their children are besieged by a host of life-threatening conditions, most not of their own making. Even upwardly mobile Black female professionals are prey to pervasive race-based dangers. The birth outcomes of college-educated Black women - matters of life and death - "resembled those of unemployed, uninsured white women with low education levels."

Studies Plumb Depths of Black Maternal Health Woes

by Molly M. Ginty

"The health problems of black women and black infants stem not just from inadequate medical care but from stress, racism, poverty and other social pressures."

This article originally appeared in Women's News.

PregnantBlackBaby Black women are twice as likely as white women to give birth prematurely and five times more likely to do so in Southern states such as Mississippi. A black woman is 3.7 times more likely to die during pregnancy than a white woman and six times more likely to do so in some urban areas such as New York City.

Researchers at the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found college-educated black women twice as likely as other women to deliver premature or underweight babies. Scientists found subjects' birth outcomes resembled those of unemployed, uninsured white women with low education levels.

"A black woman is 3.7 times more likely to die during pregnancy than a white woman."

These are among the findings of five landmark reports released by the Washington-based Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies that draw together existing data in a comprehensive review that calls for an end to the inequities. The center concludes that African American babies - who are twice as likely as white infants to die before their first birthday - will have a better shot at life if the health inequities plaguing black mothers, such as less prenatal care and adequate nutrition, are corrected.

"The health disparities affecting African American women are nothing less than shocking, and we need to address the social causes behind them," says Alexine Jackson, board president of the Black Women's Agenda.

Stress, Racism, Poverty Implicated

The center's 19-member Courage to Love: Infant Mortality Commission - funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and partnering with the UCLA School of Public Affairs and the University of Michigan's NIH Roadmap Disparities Center - says the health problems of black women and black infants stem not just from inadequate medical care but from stress, racism, poverty and other social pressures.

Released during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Annual Legislative Conference from Sept. 26 to 29, the reports also coincide with a meeting organized by the Joint Center and the Washington-based Black Women's Agenda for 250 representatives of black women's organizations in Washington, D.C. Attendees will discuss the reports and preview "Unnatural Causes: Is Inequality Making Us Sick?" an upcoming PBS television series that explores race and health.

In the five reports - one on breastfeeding, one on nutrition, two on infant mortality and one summarizing the others - commission members address the possible reasons for black women's negative birth outcomes.

Only 75 percent of African American women have prenatal care compared to 89 percent of white women.

Black women are more likely than their peers to have hypertension and diabetes, which can leave the fetus undernourished.

"Black women are 50 percent less likely to breastfeed than white or Hispanic women."

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics, in Elk Grove Village, Ill., says breastfeeding protects against ear infections, diarrhea and other health problems among infants - and though it recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life - black women are 50 percent less likely to breastfeed than white or Hispanic women.

"Black women's eating habits also play a role," notes commission member Dr. Michael C. Lu, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. "Only 1 in 4 African American women meets the recommended daily allowance for calcium, magnesium, zinc and vitamin E and 1 in 3 does not meet the RDA for iron and folate. Among low-income women, approximately 1 in 3 is anemic in the third trimester of pregnancy. And among low-income African American women, only 40 percent enter pregnancy with normal weight, and less than 30 percent achieve ideal weight gain during pregnancy."

Economic, Social Factors

Joint Center authors stress not only health factors, but economic and social conditions.

Black women are more likely to work part time and to go without health benefits. They are 20 percent more likely to be uninsured, and three times more likely to live below the federal poverty line. Research shows black women are under more stress than their peers, and that stress can compromise the immune system, disrupt the hormonal balance and threaten vascular function.

"Black women are under more stress than their peers."

The reports also implicate racism.

For instance, authors note recent studies at Chicago's Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University find African American women who deliver pre-term, very low weight infants have a twofold greater lifelong exposure to racial discrimination than African American women who deliver full-term, normal weight babies. They cite a 2007 study from Atlanta's Spelman College in which black women agree racism is a source of the stress they cite as their "major" health risk.

"For black women, the effects of racism, sexism and class are multiplicative rather than additive," says Vijaya Hogan, director of the Health Disparities Curriculum at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the Joint Center reports. "Each increases the individual effect of the other and together they add up to more than the sum of their parts."

Contributions to Overall Crisis

Experts say the same problems causing poor birth outcomes for black women are likely contributing to an overall crisis in their health.

Black women are twice as likely as white women to be overweight, have heart attacks, develop diabetes or fail to get the recommended 30 minutes of exercise daily, reports the CDC. They account for 72 percent of new AIDS cases even though they represent just 6 percent of the population, reports the Los Angeles-based Black AIDS Institute. Their life expectancy is 69 years, eight years less than for white women, reports the Census.

"Black women account for 72 percent of new AIDS cases even though they represent just 6 percent of the population."

Black-white health disparities explain why 40,000 African American women die of treatable causes each year, notes the office of the U.S. Surgeon General.

Authors of the center's reports call for better health care access and education to improve birth outcomes. They also call for sweeping social change such as legislation that will work to end economic and educational disparities.

On Sept. 29, the Chicago-based advocacy group African American Women Evolving held its own 100-member symposium on black women's health at Malcolm X College in Chicago.

"We need to pay attention to - and address - high infant mortality and other health problems affecting black women," says Gina E. Wood, deputy director of the Joint Center's Health Policy Institute. "This is broader than a medical issue. It's about the total environment - and the total life - of African American women."

Molly M. Ginty is a freelance writer based in New York City.

Monday October 8, 2007 - 02:50pm (CDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Ethnic Cleansing in San Francisco

Wednesday, 03 October 2007

SFViewby Don Santina

Not so long ago, San Francisco was home to about 100,000 Blacks, and the Fillmore district was a thriving Mecca of African American life. Today, Fillmore is gone, wiped out by "Negro Removal" in the guise of "redevelopment," and the city's Black population has shrunk to 40,000 - less than half the Black population of Augusta, Georgia. The last bastion of concentrated Black life, Hunters Point, is slated for ethnic cleansing designed to rob African Americans of not only a spectacular view of the Bay, but of any hope of remaining in the city. The "patron saint" of this racist juggernaut is none other than Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Speaker of the U.S. House.

Ethnic Cleansing in San Francisco

by Don Santina

"They want to kick you out so they can build housing they know you can't afford and allow rich San Franciscans to enjoy it. They don't feel that poor Blacks or other people of color deserve to have a view like that." - Appolonia Jordan, San Francisco BayviewSFOldFillmore

Alan Goodspeed was my next door neighbor in the Ingleside District on the south side of Ocean Avenue in San Francisco. He was a Black man from Marshall, Texas, who had moved to San Francisco during WWII and worked as a machinist for twenty five years in the shipyards of Hunters Point. Within that time, he bought a home and raised a family.

"There are probably less than 40,000 Black people left in the city."

When Alan passed away a few years ago, working class Black people had already become an endangered species in San Francisco. According to a 2005 demographic study, there are probably less than 40,000 Black people left in the city. Back in the day when Alan and I changed the oil in our cars in adjoining driveways and jawed about whether Muhammad Ali would regain the title, there were almost 100,000 black people in San Francisco.

So, here in 2007, ethnic cleansing of the Black population in the city "where little cable cars climb halfway to the stars" is more than halfway to completion.

The Jobs at the Hunter's Point Ship Yards

By 1974, most the 8,500 jobs at the shipyards created during World War II were gone, and a decade later a petulant Navy scotched plans to homeport the nuclear-armed USS Missouri when City officials objected to footing the bill with no job guarantees for locals. The shipyards were closed, and the Navy pulled out, leaving forty years of highly toxic contaminants behind them, and a commitment to clean up their mess some time in the future.

Even as jobs at the shipyards were drying up, the Hunter's Point-Bayview neighborhood was a majority Black neighborhood, a vibrant community in southwestern San Francisco which was affordable and had spectacular views of San Francisco Bay. The slaughterhouses of "Butchertown" were gone, along with most of the auto wreckers, and although it was underserved and largely ignored by City officialdom (except for heavy-handed police presence), the neighborhood was hearth and home for thousands of Black Americans.

Gentrification Rears its Ugly Head

Fast forward twenty years from the Navy's retreat. San Francisco's housing dynamic has changed drastically. Home prices and rents have skyrocketed. A studio rents for $1,800 and a small condo fetches $650,000 to $800,000. The City's light industry has disappeared, and, while most of the dot commers dot come and dot gone, they were replaced by a new urban class of middle managers, hedge fund hustlers, fashion designers, bio-meds, money changers, paper brokers, and techies of all persuasions. Gentrification has metastasized throughout the City, spilling out of the central Victorian neighborhoods into the outlying frontiers, like Hunter's Point/Bayview.

"A studio rents for $1,800 and a small condo fetches $650,000 to $800,000."

Consequently, the public lands on which the shipyards once stood provided both lucrative opportunities for developers and desirable potential properties for the new yuppie class.

On the part of the shipyard now known as Parcel A, the bulldozers, scrapers and graders of the Lennar Corporation are hard at work, flattening a former hillside for new homes and condos. The original plan approved by the City included affordable rental units in the mix. However, those units have now been scrapped. Lennar reneged on the affordable housing part of the plan, claiming a lack of profitability.

Very few, if any, of the local residents will be able to afford the new residences and they will be forced out of this last corner of the City, as the prices go up around them. And, to add injury to insult, the asbestos dust being raised during construction is making the neighbors sick.

Dress Rehearsal in the Fillmore

To understand what's happening today at Hunter's Point, it is necessary to understand what happened in San Francisco's Fillmore District in the 1960's and 1970's. The Fillmore, often called the "Harlem of the West," was a center of Black culture in the decades following World War II. Like Tulsa in the early 1920's, the Fillmore was a flourishing home for thousands of Black people and hundreds of Black-owned markets, auto repair garages, barber shops, salons, restaurants, shoe repair shops, Laundromats, night clubs, and apparel stores. Among those businesses was the legendary Jimbo's Bop City, which featured performances by jazz immortals like Billie Holiday, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, and John Coltrane.

And then came something called Urban Renewal in the guise of a heavily-cloaked urban real estate operation called the Redevelopment Agency. When the RA was finished, the Fillmore was gone. The bulldozers had smashed and leveled block after block after block. The fabulous Fillmore looked like a bombed-out city in an old newsreel. And that's exactly what it was, displaced residents and all. The people who lived in the Fillmore were dispersed to the East Bay cities of Oakland, Richmond, and to Hunter's Point/Bayview. As the Redevelopment Agency smashed homes and businesses, it issued thousands of certificates of preference to the people of the Fillmore. These certificates were documents which gave the displaced businesses and families a promise of preference for renting or buying other redevelopment property within the City and the right to return to the neighborhood from which they'd been evicted.

"The people who lived in the Fillmore were dispersed to the East Bay cities of Oakland, Richmond, and to Hunter's Point/Bayview."

Of the 883 certificates given to Black-owned businesses, only 39 resulted in other business locations. Of the 4,719 certificates given to families, only 1,099 certificates put families in other homes. Somehow, the Redevelopment Agency lost contact with 3,055 families and 590 businesses which held certificates of preference.

Today, the Fillmore is almost completely gentrified. Much of the neighborhood has been condo-ized and yuppified, replete with foo-foo restaurants and ersatz jazz festivals. However, a pocket of Black families remain in the neighborhood with enough young Black men to be targeted for a gang injunction from the City Attorney.

The Gangs of San Francisco

Most observers of Urban America agree that there appears to be a national program to target, arrest and warehouse young Black men into the "criminal justice" - that is, prison industrial complex - system across the United States. Aside from the near genocidal effect of the proactive criminalization of an entire generation, this program also serves as a convenient method for clearing out the soon-to-be-lucrative neighborhoods of the former "inner cities," neighborhoods which will provide potential profit for hungry real estate and investment industries.

"San Francisco police arrest African-Americans at a higher rate than any other city in California."

The City of Saint Francis is no exception to the rule. A recent study found that San Francisco police arrest African-Americans at a higher rate than any other city in California, even as the number of Black people living in the city diminishes. However, it seems that the simple policy of arresting young Black men is not efficient enough to move them out of town. They must also be kept from gathering in their own neighborhoods. Accordingly--in keeping with the continuing national dismemberment of the Constitution--the City Attorney of San Francisco has sought gang injunctions against a list of African American gangs in the Fillmore known as Eddy Rock, Chopper City, and Knockout Posse, along with some "gangs" in the Mission. Last year, the first injunction was granted against the alleged "Oakdale Mob" in Hunter's Point/Bayview.

Under these injunctions, alleged members of the alleged gangs are prohibited from meeting with each other in designated geographic locations, like, uh, their own neighborhoods. Aside from the questionable constitutionality of these injunctions, the fact remains that these injunctions literally drive non-white residents out of their own neighborhoods.

For the local folks who have some idea of what's going on, the irony of these court-ordered gang injunctions is that the most powerful, ruthless, and rapacious gang in San Francisco is glaringly absent from the City Attorney's list.

The Downtown Gang (AWDG)

SFHuntersPointMap Not surprisingly, the City Attorney's injunction list did not include the Downtown Gang, also known as the AWDG (All White Downtown Gang). These gang members virtually control all public policy in San Francisco, including who will live in the City and who will not.

How does one identify members of the Downtown Gang? Well, for starters, like members of all gangs, the AWDG hang out together: at museum galas, society do's, first nighters at the opera and the symphony, parties in Pacific Heights, winter in Tahoe, and so forth. But the best way to ID them is to use the old-fashioned follow-the-money method. Pick a politician, check out the big buck contributors, and then see whether the politician's policies benefit private sector profit or the public good. It doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to find a political spear carrier for the AWDG and then the AWDG member who owns and supplies the spears.

"The ‘Care Not Cash' proposition would solve the problem of homeless people by slashing monthly welfare payments from $395 to $59."

A textbook example is the current mayor, Gavin Newsom. Newsom, the extremely personable shill for all things rich and white in San Francisco, pulls all the levers and pushes all the buttons that put the policies of the AWDG into motion, which include sweeping out homeless people, lowering business taxes and continuing the privatization of public housing.

As a San Francisco supervisor, Newsome made his bones for the AWDG in 2002 by placing his "Care Not Cash" proposition on the ballot which would solve the problem of homeless people by slashing monthly welfare payments from $395 to $59 in return for a proposed system of "care." "Care Not Cash" would have flopped without the big buck effort behind it.

The campaign for the "Care Not Cash" proposition, known to homeless advocates as "Neither Care Nor Cash," was funded by a shadowy group called SFSOS, or San Francisco SOS, which was founded by Warren Hellman, heir to the Wells Fargo fortune, Donald Fisher, the sweatshop king of the Gap/Banana Republic/Old Navy clothing empire, and Senator Diane Feinstein. Other original supporters included financial heavy hitters like Charles Schwab, William Hume, Feinstein's husband - the war profiteer, Richard Blum - and socialites like Dede Wilsey. In addition to its outright attack on the homeless, SFSOS also opposed the living wage campaign, affordable housing and tenant protection and supported re-segregation of the public schools system through charterization.

SFSOS and the AWDG won big in the ensuing election.

Merchants Have No Country

Thomas Jefferson noted toward the end of his life that "merchants have no country," in that the merchant's first loyalty is always to profit. He could have just as readily said that the merchants have no political party either. Business loyalty to self interest rather than common interest is rife in modern American politics where corporations regularly hedge their bets by contributing to opposing candidates. Such was the situation when Supervisor Newsom ran for mayor in 2003.

As Election Day neared, it became apparent that Newsom was barely ahead of his Green Party opponent, Matt Gonzalez, even though he was outspending him by a 10 to 1 margin. The possibility of a Green coming to power in San Francisco so terrified the AWDG that the gang pulled out all of the stops and flew into action, calling in celebrity Democrats like Bill Clinton and Al Gore and coughing up cash. Diane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi hit the phones. The heirs of the Getty oil fortune Republican businessmen rushed to the fore. George Shultz, a Republican flush with new found Bechtel riches from Iraq, opened his wallet, as did the heirs to the Getty oil fortune who were Newsom's original sponsors. Republicans Charles Schwab and Donald Fisher wrote checks. The Swig and Shorenstein families, real estate developers who had underwritten the activities of local Democrats for years, dialed in their dollars.

"No one in the neighborhood will ever be able to live in the new housing units."

And, of course, Newsom won and policies favored by the AWDG continue to flourish during his regime - like the onslaught to quickly privatize the shipyards property, regardless of the health of the residents during construction on this toxic site, or the fact that no one in the neighborhood will ever be able to live in the new housing units. In 2006, Lennar Corporation was cited multiple times for failing to monitor and control asbestos dust during the grading phase on Parcel A. Oddly enough, the project was never shut down to correct any non-compliant operations. Finally, several local African American neighborhood organizations went to City Hall this year to protest this continuing contamination and request that the City red tag the site until safety measures could be enforced. Their request fell upon deaf ears.

Meanwhile, the AWDG, not content with securing a financial stranglehold on future development of public lands, continues to target existing public housing for privatization.

Hunter's View and the Patron Saint of Privatization

The situation at Hunter's View, a public housing project in the Hunter's Point/Bayview neighborhood with a scenic view of the Bay Bridge and the Bay, is a classic case of how politicians, developers, and financial interests work together to achieve their respective ends of power and profit at the expense of people. In 1997, a grandmother and five children burned to death in Hunter's View because the smoke detectors didn't work. A recent inspection - ten years later - found that 64% of the units still had non functioning smoke detectors and pockets of sewage bubble up in and around these rat-infested homes.

Do you think City Hall rushed plumbers, carpenters and electricians out there to fix things up? Go sit in the corner if you answered in the affirmative.

Here's how privatization for profit works: first) don't maintain anything, let everything deteriorate; second) throw up your hands in dismay of ever being able to repair anything with the meager public funds available; third) call in private developers and their bankers to "help out'; fourth) evict the residents because by now everything has to be torn down, and fifth) build units to buy, not to rent, that the evicted residents can't afford.

"Do you think that the snail's pace rebuild of the infrastructure and return of the displaced residents of New Orleans is accidental?"

When the Federal government purposely abandoned the "inner cities" of Urban America almost thirty years ago, the vacuum left in its wake created vast and lucrative investment opportunities for the exploitation of public property. Do you think that the snail's pace rebuild of the infrastructure and return of the displaced residents of New Orleans is accidental? Go sit in the corner!

In San Francisco, the patron saint of privatization is Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, known to some locals as "Nancy Privatisi" for her landmark work in taking the 1,200 acres of public land in the Presidio and placing it into private hands. Even the staid San Francisco Chronicle couldn't avoid noting that the Presidio was "the first privatized national park in the United States."

How about a little Q and A? Who was one of the founding directors of the Presidio Trust? Donald Fisher. Who appointed him? Bill Clinton. Who is a major contributor to Pelosi's campaign, while at the same time being a charter member of the SFSOS, the AWDG and the Republican Party? Donald Fisher. Who's going to construct a museum to himself - excuse me - for his art collection, in the Presidio? Donald Fisher. Who supports it? Nancy Pelosi.

There's also a plan to put a Walt Disney museum in the Presidio which would be appropriate because Nancy's husband, Paul, owns a bit of Disney. A local union organizer suggested that it would be fitting that a third museum be erected between the first two museums-a museum to sweatshop workers.

"The patron saint of privatization is Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi."

Getting back to Hunter's View, Newsom has been seen cruising the neighborhood with developers from the AWDG. Hunter's View is a perfect candidate for privatization: it has a view that yuppies will pay big bucks for, and it's sufficiently destabilized to warrant complete leveling.

Hunter's Point resident Appolonia Jordan, in a recent article in the Black-owned San Francisco Bayview newspaper, wrote, "I know you have noticed the groups of clean, pressed suited white men who jump out of these brand new SUVs with Mayor Gavin Newsom looking around your housing project. They smile and sometimes even talk to the ‘poor' children playing outside."

In response to a Chronicle series about the dire living situation at Hunter's View, Pelosi, whose nephew Laurence has worked for both Lennar and Newsom, announced that the Democrats had not only increased funding for public housing, but that their $1 million allotment for Hunter's View would create "one-for-one replacement of 267 public housing units" with "new affordable rental units," and "market rate homes."

Sounds familiar. Sounds like Lennar's original plan for the shipyards. Sounds like the Fillmore.

Don Santina is a cultural historian and third generation San Franciscan who received a 2005 Superior Scribing Award for his Black Commentator article, "Reparations for the Blues." He recently appeared in a Canadian Sportsnet TV feature on racism and baseball with Danny Glover and Barry Bonds. He can be reached at ' ); document.write( addy39367 ); document.write( '\n lindey89@aol.com. This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Monday October 8, 2007 - 02:47pm (CDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments
From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images

From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images

HipHopDuoPimpsby Lisa Fager

There can be no doubt that much Hip Hop product is pathological. But who's product is it? Industry activist Lisa Fager went to Capitol Hill to school lawmakers on the real purveyors of audio and video mayhem: the music and communications corporations that control the destructive content that saturates the market. Pathology is not limited to musical product; it oozes into the public discourse in the form of racist speech and images that defame the powerless - all for the sake of corporate profit margins. Under relentless media consolidation, music playlists have become uniform indicators of massive payola - "an organized corporate crime."

From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images

by Lisa FagerHipHopFageratFCC

"Media conglomerates are the gatekeepers of content."

The following is testimony prepared by Lisa Fager of Industryears for Congressional Hearings on Hip Hop. It was first published in Davey D's Hip Hop Corner.

Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images. My name is Lisa Fager Bediako, and I am the President and co-founder of Industry Ears.

Industry Ears is a nonprofit, nonpartisan and independent organization which has focused on the impact media has on communities of color and children since 2003. My co-founder, Paul Porter and I have, collectively, more than 40 years of experience working for media and entertainment companies including Black Entertainment Television, Clear Channel Communications, Emmis Communications, Discovery Communications, CBS radio, Capital-EMI records, Def Jam Records, AOL, NBA Entertainment, Radio One, Discovery.com, and Inner City Broadcasting.

Using our insiders' knowledge, we created Industry Ears and industryears.com to address the myths and misconceptions about how media and the entertainment industry operate; and, more importantly, to develop effective means to combat the negative consequences of harmful media messages and images on children, particularly children of color.

My testimony today will focus on the following: 1) the fallout following the Imus incident, including the identity of the real culprits, and their roles in perpetuating stereotypes; 2) the disproportionate impact of negative media on the African American community; 3) the beneficiaries of negative and stereotypical media messages; and finally, some Industry Ears recommendations to address these problems.

"The ‘Imus Incident' has created strange bedfellows."

The now-infamous "Imus Incident" is intriguing in that it has created strange bedfellows: it has unified both conservative and liberal media in invoking Hip Hop music as the veritable poster child of all that is wrong with society. That is, a popular argument made in the throes of Imus' oft-repeated "nappy-headed hoes" comment is that such language pales in comparison to the content of most commercialized Hip Hop music. The idea is that if radio stations and Viacom music channels can play the "bitch, ho, nigga" content of gangsta rappers, then what is so bad about Imus' comment? If the Black community apparently accepts such language from its own, then why get upset when Don Imus says it?

It is easy for me to understand why Black folk would be in an uproar over a White man referring to young Black women as "nappy headed hoes" on a nationally syndicated radio show; as a Black woman, that part should be intuitive. However, what appears to be more difficult to understand - especially to our friends in the news media - is that there exists a large cadre of individuals and organizations that represent communities of color that also are in an uproar when media permits content that is degrading to women and people of color to be broadcast. Note that, unlike the conservative and liberal media hypes, our concern is not simplistically directed at the artists who produce such material; our concern is also directed towards the record labels, radio stations, and music video channels (i.e., the corporations) that are profiting from allowing such material to air.

This is the fact that often gets overlooked in the mainstream media. Not all Black people and not all lovers of Hip Hop endorse the materialism, violence, and misogyny that characterize commercial rap music. Organizations and campaigns such as Industry Ears, Enough is Enough, Social Action Coalition, Youth Media Council, Third World Majority, Woman's Coalition for Decency and Dignity, REACHip Hop, Free Mix Radio and many individuals have been challenging such content for years, but their visibility has been blocked by the mainstream media.

"Our concern is also directed towards the record labels, radio stations, and music video channels (i.e., the corporations) that are profiting from allowing such material to air."

For example, during the week in which Imus was suspended and subsequently fired by CBS, I was called by three national news outlets to speak about the hip hop music issue. However, each outlet only wanted me to defend the commercialized Hip Hop industry; no one was interested in the fact that I also agreed that "bad" content applies across the board and should also be dealt with. The message is clear: If you do not fit the "role" media has created for ratings you lose your opportunity to be heard.

It is time to wake up and see the real issue - that and in essence control what opinions receive airtime. The deletion of the Fairness Doctrine and passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act helped to create incredibly powerful, big media corporations by eliminating the requirement that balanced viewpoints be presented, and by relaxing rules placing limits on how much media a single corporation could own.

Further, by repealing the tax certificate program, which successfully - if temporarily - increased ownership of media outlets by people of color, we have ensured that these big media corporations do not represent the diversity of society. Then, with control of so much media concentrated in the hands of the very few, we are at the mercy of big media and rely on companies to serve in the best interest of the public while also serving their bottom line.

HipHop50Cent As might seem obvious, what best serves the public, and what best serves the bottom line are not always the same. This is evidenced by the fact that CBS fired Imus only when corporate sponsors started to pull out; Imus has made offensive and derogatory statements before. Commercialized Hip Hop has flourished in this environment, giving public perception that what you see and hear on radio and TV has been set as community standard. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) states that it is a federal violation to broadcast indecent or sexually explicit content between the hours of 6am and 10pm. However, songs that discuss explicit sexual situations including oral sex, rape, casual sex and gang sex receive daily spins on radio stations and video music channels that cater to the 12-17 year old demographic.

"CBS fired Imus only when corporate sponsors started to pull out."

Freedom of speech has been spun by industry conglomerates to mean the b-word, n-word and ho while censoring and eliminating Hip Hop music that discusses Hurricane Katrina, the Iraq War, Jena 6, dangers of gun violence and drugs and songs that contains words like "George Bush" and "Free Mumia."
In 2005, MTV and radio stations around the country self-regulated themselves to remove the words "white man" from the Kanye West hit single "All Fall Down." The lyrics demonstrated the far reach of capitalism by exclaiming "Drug dealers buy Jordans, crackheads buy crack/ And a white man get paid off of all of that." When asked why they decided to dub "white man" from the lyrics the response from MTV was "we didn't want to offend anyone."

Today, Hip Hop is bombarded by the demeaning images of the black male thug and the sleazy video vixen. Record labels and their executives choose to support and promote these images for airplay solely as if these are the only images that represent black people. I understand that payola is out of the scope of this subcommittee, however I think it is important to mention, because it is a major contributor to how music receives radio and video airplay.

Former Attorney General Elliott Spitzer, now Governor of New York, made deals with four major record labels - Sony BMG, Warner, Universal and EMI - totaling $30.1 million as well as with two broadcasters, CBS and Entercom, for another $6.25 million in his state-wide payola investigation that also implicated many outside of New York. Meanwhile, the FCC settled with a consent decree that stopped the federal investigation of payola and allowed broadcasters to avoid a finding of liability for this violation by entering into a settlement agreement costing them a measly $12.5 million in combined fees.

"Payola is now an organized corporate crime that supports the lack of balanced content and demeaning imagery with no consequences."

All over the country you have identical playlists from station to station no matter what the radio format and it's no coincidence. Payola is no longer the local DJ receiving a couple dollars for airplay; it is now an organized corporate crime that supports the lack of balanced content and demeaning imagery with no consequences. Broadcaster claims that this is what listeners want to hear is not honest. Radio stations only research the songs that are currently being played on the radio (i.e. songs that are paid for). New artists with new songs do not get tested. This explains the identical playlists and the exclusion of local and regional artist airplay on radio stations.

Stereotypes and degrading images in both radio and television disproportionately impact the African American community. There are a wealth of shows on networks like Viacom that capitalize and profit from demeaning women and black people, including the following examples:

"Flavor of Love," which stars former Public Enemy artist Flavor Flav, as a modern buffoon, focused solely on the objectification of women

"Where My Dogs At" is an animated program which includes an episode where a rapper leads black women on leashes, like dogs, down a red carpet, where one of the women defecates on the floor.

"Yo Momma" pits teens against each other to yell disrespecting and sometimes racist insults, and "We Can Do Better," aka a "Hot Ghetto Mess," demeans and makes fun of every day people all in the name of entertainment. The cumulative effect suggests to the targeted audience that this is the way things are and how they should act.

"'We Can Do Better,' aka a ‘Hot Ghetto Mess,' demeans and makes fun of every day people all in the name of entertainment."

A good example of records, radio and corporate partnerships includes a song on Virgin Records label called, "Ms. New Booty." This song, performed by a white rapper was silly and tasteless, but the promotion by the record label and partnership with "Girls Gone Wild" was truly offensive. A local Washington DC DJ at 5pm promoted the tune by suggesting he likes to visit the MsNewBooty.com website to masturbate. The website, created by Virgin Records, asked girls to enter a contest for the "best new booty." Girls were required to take photos of their butts and post them online. Each week people would vote for the best "booty" of the week with the winner receiving a chance to be in a music video.
It was obvious that girls under 17 were entering the contest (some even listed their myspace accounts making it easy for child predators). The "Girls Gone Wild" partner was listed at the top of the website and linked making it easy for pre-teens and others to access. I wrote an open letter to Virgin records and Jermaine Dupri, president of Urban Music responded by saying, "it was all in fun and it wasn't about sex." Later that same month Jermaine Dupri appeared in an article in Billboard magazine and stated "Southern Hip Hop is inspired by strip clubs."

It is important to note, that African American children listen and watch more radio and television than any other demographic. Although Top 40 and Hip Hop radio stations claim to target the 18-34 demographic their largest audience share are the 12-17 year old segment. Recording companies, radio stations and Viacom networks are aware of their audience but have chosen to put the bottom line above the welfare of their audiences.

"African American children listen and watch more radio and television than any other demographic."

In the documentary, Hip Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes, a group of white teens are asked what they think about Hip Hop. They explained, "Hip Hop gives a better insight into black culture and what its like to grow up in the ghetto," as if all black people had the same experience.

Bakari Kitwana, professor and author of several books dealing with Hip Hop and politics said when he was researching information for his next book he asked white women from all of the country what they felt about rappers who used the b-word to describe women? The overwhelming majority responded by saying, "they were not offended because the rappers weren't describing them, they were only talking about black women."

These perpetuated stereotypes and demeaning images are reflective in the behavior and attitudes of children and specifically children of color. We see an increase in risky sexual behavior - black girls 15-24 years old represent the fastest growing segment of HIV patients, devaluing of education and rise in the dropout rate. Reports show as high as 75% dropout rates among black 9th grade boys, unhealthy interpersonal relationships, increase in aggression, a normalization of criminal activity and materialism.

In sum, because I'm sure the industry will shrug at the notion that their actions have led to or influenced any of this behavior, I strongly suggest that a research study look at the direct impact of degrading and stereotypical images on children and adults. This study will help us understand the direct implications and back up the policy and regulations that need to be implemented and enforced.

Lisa Fager can be contacted through the IndustryEars website, or at ' ); document.write( addy_text53766 ); document.write( '\n Lisa@industryears.com This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Monday October 8, 2007 - 02:44pm (CDT) Permanent Link | 0 Comments

Add black's Blog to your personalized My Yahoo! page:

Add to My Yahoo!RSS About My Yahoo! & RSS
1 - 5 of 110 First | < Prev | Next > | Last