"in order to know god you have to know the universe" dogon tribe
food for thought.
| African America - Black History - U.S. | |
| Wednesday, 21 March 2007 | |
| A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford
Affirmative White Preference for Black ImmigrantsA Black Agenda Radio Commentary by BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford "Intra-Black differences do not shape the policies of elite universities or corporate head-hunters. White people do." A recent study shows that immigrant Blacks, or the sons and daughters of Black people from the Caribbean, Latin America and Africa, now make up about 25 percent of Black enrollment at Ivy League and other elite universities. This, of course, does not happen by accident. Immigrant Blacks are twice as numerous at the most coveted colleges as their proportion in higher education as a whole. Which naturally causes me to think of Barack Obama. Why? Because the top-heaviness of immigrant-background Blacks at the most selective universities proves only one thing: that they are preferred by white people over home-grown African Americans - just as Barack Obama has become a superstar because of white preference. Unfortunately, discussion of the new study's findings tends to center on the supposed failures of Black American culture, failings that are claimed to be so profound that these poor, flawed souls cannot even be accommodated by well-meaning college affirmative action programs. There ARE cultural differences between self-selected Black immigrants, who tend to come from more advantaged backgrounds in their home countries, and the masses of Black people who have been here all along. But intra-Black differences do not shape the policies of elite universities or corporate head-hunters. White people do. And, to paraphrase Kanye West, white Americans don't much like African Americans. "Affirmative action as largely practiced in the United States simply gives white folks more options." Immigrant Blacks have always gotten at least a partial pass in white society. Not much of a pass, but enough to get very visibly Black Cubans and Dominicans into white baseball long before Jackie Robinson's entrance into the Big Leagues. What people should be studying is not the relative success of immigrant Blacks in higher education and other rungs on the socioeconomic ladder, but what white people bring to the decision-making process that collectively gives preference to Blacks who appear to be different from the natives - and therefore more prepared for success in a white dominated environment. Affirmative action, originally a response to Black demands that white society make up for centuries of African American slavery and exclusion, soon devolved into a white people's game of "diversity," in which they could pick and choose among various minorities - and women of all backgrounds. Now they have taken the white preference game into the shrinking corner of affirmative action still reserved for Blacks, and are tilting that playing field in favor of African-descended people of non-U.S. backgrounds. Just as they have anointed Barack Obama a Black leader. The Black struggle was always about power, not the creation of white dominated committees to elevate selected dark-skinned folks to higher corporate and academic status. Affirmative action as largely practiced in the United States simply gives white folks more options to pick and choose their own favorites - and then call it "progress." For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. To listen to or download this Black Agenda Radio commentary, click on the mic at left. To comment on or read what others have to day about this item, click here to visit its page on the Black Agenda Blog. | |
| Wednesday, 03 October 2007 | |
| by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley A famous old English song is titled, "The World Turned Upside Down." Such appears to be the insane vantage point through which the Bush regime, and many ordinary citizens, |
| Wednesday, 03 October 2007 | |
| by Molly M. Ginty The stresses of racism contribute mightily to horrendous mortality levels among Black women and infants in the United States, according to a group of studies recently released by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. Black women and their children are besieged by a host of life-threatening conditions, most not of their own making. Even upwardly mobile Black female professionals are prey to pervasive race-based dangers. The birth outcomes of college-educated Black women - matters of life and death - "resembled those of unemployed, uninsured white women with low education levels." Studies Plumb Depths of Black Maternal Health Woesby Molly M. Ginty "The health problems of black women and black infants stem not just from inadequate medical care but from stress, racism, poverty and other social pressures." This article originally appeared in Women's News.
Researchers at the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found college-educated black women twice as likely as other women to deliver premature or underweight babies. Scientists found subjects' birth outcomes resembled those of unemployed, uninsured white women with low education levels. "A black woman is 3.7 times more likely to die during pregnancy than a white woman." These are among the findings of five landmark reports released by the Washington-based Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies that draw together existing data in a comprehensive review that calls for an end to the inequities. The center concludes that African American babies - who are twice as likely as white infants to die before their first birthday - will have a better shot at life if the health inequities plaguing black mothers, such as less prenatal care and adequate nutrition, are corrected. "The health disparities affecting African American women are nothing less than shocking, and we need to address the social causes behind them," says Alexine Jackson, board president of the Black Women's Agenda. Stress, Racism, Poverty Implicated The center's 19-member Courage to Love: Infant Mortality Commission - funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and partnering with the UCLA School of Public Affairs and the University of Michigan's NIH Roadmap Disparities Center - says the health problems of black women and black infants stem not just from inadequate medical care but from stress, racism, poverty and other social pressures. Released during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Annual Legislative Conference from Sept. 26 to 29, the reports also coincide with a meeting organized by the Joint Center and the Washington-based Black Women's Agenda for 250 representatives of black women's organizations in Washington, D.C. Attendees will discuss the reports and preview "Unnatural Causes: Is Inequality Making Us Sick?" an upcoming PBS television series that explores race and health. In the five reports - one on breastfeeding, one on nutrition, two on infant mortality and one summarizing the others - commission members address the possible reasons for black women's negative birth outcomes. Only 75 percent of African American women have prenatal care compared to 89 percent of white women. Black women are more likely than their peers to have hypertension and diabetes, which can leave the fetus undernourished. "Black women are 50 percent less likely to breastfeed than white or Hispanic women." Although the American Academy of Pediatrics, in Elk Grove Village, Ill., says breastfeeding protects against ear infections, diarrhea and other health problems among infants - and though it recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life - black women are 50 percent less likely to breastfeed than white or Hispanic women. "Black women's eating habits also play a role," notes commission member Dr. Michael C. Lu, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. "Only 1 in 4 African American women meets the recommended daily allowance for calcium, magnesium, zinc and vitamin E and 1 in 3 does not meet the RDA for iron and folate. Among low-income women, approximately 1 in 3 is anemic in the third trimester of pregnancy. And among low-income African American women, only 40 percent enter pregnancy with normal weight, and less than 30 percent achieve ideal weight gain during pregnancy." Economic, Social Factors Joint Center authors stress not only health factors, but economic and social conditions. Black women are more likely to work part time and to go without health benefits. They are 20 percent more likely to be uninsured, and three times more likely to live below the federal poverty line. Research shows black women are under more stress than their peers, and that stress can compromise the immune system, disrupt the hormonal balance and threaten vascular function. "Black women are under more stress than their peers." The reports also implicate racism. For instance, authors note recent studies at Chicago's Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University find African American women who deliver pre-term, very low weight infants have a twofold greater lifelong exposure to racial discrimination than African American women who deliver full-term, normal weight babies. They cite a 2007 study from Atlanta's Spelman College in which black women agree racism is a source of the stress they cite as their "major" health risk. "For black women, the effects of racism, sexism and class are multiplicative rather than additive," says Vijaya Hogan, director of the Health Disparities Curriculum at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the Joint Center reports. "Each increases the individual effect of the other and together they add up to more than the sum of their parts." Contributions to Overall Crisis Experts say the same problems causing poor birth outcomes for black women are likely contributing to an overall crisis in their health. Black women are twice as likely as white women to be overweight, have heart attacks, develop diabetes or fail to get the recommended 30 minutes of exercise daily, reports the CDC. They account for 72 percent of new AIDS cases even though they represent just 6 percent of the population, reports the Los Angeles-based Black AIDS Institute. Their life expectancy is 69 years, eight years less than for white women, reports the Census. "Black women account for 72 percent of new AIDS cases even though they represent just 6 percent of the population." Black-white health disparities explain why 40,000 African American women die of treatable causes each year, notes the office of the U.S. Surgeon General. Authors of the center's reports call for better health care access and education to improve birth outcomes. They also call for sweeping social change such as legislation that will work to end economic and educational disparities. On Sept. 29, the Chicago-based advocacy group African American Women Evolving held its own 100-member symposium on black women's health at Malcolm X College in Chicago. "We need to pay attention to - and address - high infant mortality and other health problems affecting black women," says Gina E. Wood, deputy director of the Joint Center's Health Policy Institute. "This is broader than a medical issue. It's about the total environment - and the total life - of African American women." Molly M. Ginty is a freelance writer based in New York City. |
| Wednesday, 03 October 2007 | |
|
Not so long ago, San Francisco was home to about 100,000 Blacks, and the Fillmore district was a thriving Mecca of African American life. Today, Fillmore is gone, wiped out by "Negro Removal" in the guise of "redevelopment," and the city's Black population has shrunk to 40,000 - less than half the Black population of Augusta, Georgia. The last bastion of concentrated Black life, Hunters Point, is slated for ethnic cleansing designed to rob African Americans of not only a spectacular view of the Bay, but of any hope of remaining in the city. The "patron saint" of this racist juggernaut is none other than Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Speaker of the U.S. House. Ethnic Cleansing in San Franciscoby Don Santina "They want to kick you out so they can build housing they know you can't afford and allow rich San Franciscans to enjoy it. They don't feel that poor Blacks or other people of color deserve to have a view like that." - Appolonia Jordan, San Francisco Bayview Alan Goodspeed was my next door neighbor in the Ingleside District on the south side of Ocean Avenue in San Francisco. He was a Black man from Marshall, Texas, who had moved to San Francisco during WWII and worked as a machinist for twenty five years in the shipyards of Hunters Point. Within that time, he bought a home and raised a family. "There are probably less than 40,000 Black people left in the city." When Alan passed away a few years ago, working class Black people had already become an endangered species in San Francisco. According to a 2005 demographic study, there are probably less than 40,000 Black people left in the city. Back in the day when Alan and I changed the oil in our cars in adjoining driveways and jawed about whether Muhammad Ali would regain the title, there were almost 100,000 black people in San Francisco. So, here in 2007, ethnic cleansing of the Black population in the city "where little cable cars climb halfway to the stars" is more than halfway to completion. The Jobs at the Hunter's Point Ship Yards By 1974, most the 8,500 jobs at the shipyards created during World War II were gone, and a decade later a petulant Navy scotched plans to homeport the nuclear-armed USS Missouri when City officials objected to footing the bill with no job guarantees for locals. The shipyards were closed, and the Navy pulled out, leaving forty years of highly toxic contaminants behind them, and a commitment to clean up their mess some time in the future. Even as jobs at the shipyards were drying up, the Hunter's Point-Bayview neighborhood was a majority Black neighborhood, a vibrant community in southwestern San Francisco which was affordable and had spectacular views of San Francisco Bay. The slaughterhouses of "Butchertown" were gone, along with most of the auto wreckers, and although it was underserved and largely ignored by City officialdom (except for heavy-handed police presence), the neighborhood was hearth and home for thousands of Black Americans. Gentrification Rears its Ugly Head Fast forward twenty years from the Navy's retreat. San Francisco's housing dynamic has changed drastically. Home prices and rents have skyrocketed. A studio rents for $1,800 and a small condo fetches $650,000 to $800,000. The City's light industry has disappeared, and, while most of the dot commers dot come and dot gone, they were replaced by a new urban class of middle managers, hedge fund hustlers, fashion designers, bio-meds, money changers, paper brokers, and techies of all persuasions. Gentrification has metastasized throughout the City, spilling out of the central Victorian neighborhoods into the outlying frontiers, like Hunter's Point/Bayview. "A studio rents for $1,800 and a small condo fetches $650,000 to $800,000." Consequently, the public lands on which the shipyards once stood provided both lucrative opportunities for developers and desirable potential properties for the new yuppie class. On the part of the shipyard now known as Parcel A, the bulldozers, scrapers and graders of the Lennar Corporation are hard at work, flattening a former hillside for new homes and condos. The original plan approved by the City included affordable rental units in the mix. However, those units have now been scrapped. Lennar reneged on the affordable housing part of the plan, claiming a lack of profitability. Very few, if any, of the local residents will be able to afford the new residences and they will be forced out of this last corner of the City, as the prices go up around them. And, to add injury to insult, the asbestos dust being raised during construction is making the neighbors sick. Dress Rehearsal in the Fillmore To understand what's happening today at Hunter's Point, it is necessary to understand what happened in San Francisco's Fillmore District in the 1960's and 1970's. The Fillmore, often called the "Harlem of the West," was a center of Black culture in the decades following World War II. Like Tulsa in the early 1920's, the Fillmore was a flourishing home for thousands of Black people and hundreds of Black-owned markets, auto repair garages, barber shops, salons, restaurants, shoe repair shops, Laundromats, night clubs, and apparel stores. Among those businesses was the legendary Jimbo's Bop City, which featured performances by jazz immortals like Billie Holiday, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, and John Coltrane. And then came something called Urban Renewal in the guise of a heavily-cloaked urban real estate operation called the Redevelopment Agency. When the RA was finished, the Fillmore was gone. The bulldozers had smashed and leveled block after block after block. The fabulous Fillmore looked like a bombed-out city in an old newsreel. And that's exactly what it was, displaced residents and all. The people who lived in the Fillmore were dispersed to the East Bay cities of Oakland, Richmond, and to Hunter's Point/Bayview. As the Redevelopment Agency smashed homes and businesses, it issued thousands of certificates of preference to the people of the Fillmore. These certificates were documents which gave the displaced businesses and families a promise of preference for renting or buying other redevelopment property within the City and the right to return to the neighborhood from which they'd been evicted. "The people who lived in the Fillmore were dispersed to the East Bay cities of Oakland, Richmond, and to Hunter's Point/Bayview." Of the 883 certificates given to Black-owned businesses, only 39 resulted in other business locations. Of the 4,719 certificates given to families, only 1,099 certificates put families in other homes. Somehow, the Redevelopment Agency lost contact with 3,055 families and 590 businesses which held certificates of preference. Today, the Fillmore is almost completely gentrified. Much of the neighborhood has been condo-ized and yuppified, replete with foo-foo restaurants and ersatz jazz festivals. However, a pocket of Black families remain in the neighborhood with enough young Black men to be targeted for a gang injunction from the City Attorney. The Gangs of San Francisco Most observers of Urban America agree that there appears to be a national program to target, arrest and warehouse young Black men into the "criminal justice" - that is, prison industrial complex - system across the United States. Aside from the near genocidal effect of the proactive criminalization of an entire generation, this program also serves as a convenient method for clearing out the soon-to-be-lucrative neighborhoods of the former "inner cities," neighborhoods which will provide potential profit for hungry real estate and investment industries. "San Francisco police arrest African-Americans at a higher rate than any other city in California." The City of Saint Francis is no exception to the rule. A recent study found that San Francisco police arrest African-Americans at a higher rate than any other city in California, even as the number of Black people living in the city diminishes. However, it seems that the simple policy of arresting young Black men is not efficient enough to move them out of town. They must also be kept from gathering in their own neighborhoods. Accordingly--in keeping with the continuing national dismemberment of the Constitution--the City Attorney of San Francisco has sought gang injunctions against a list of African American gangs in the Fillmore known as Eddy Rock, Chopper City, and Knockout Posse, along with some "gangs" in the Mission. Last year, the first injunction was granted against the alleged "Oakdale Mob" in Hunter's Point/Bayview. Under these injunctions, alleged members of the alleged gangs are prohibited from meeting with each other in designated geographic locations, like, uh, their own neighborhoods. Aside from the questionable constitutionality of these injunctions, the fact remains that these injunctions literally drive non-white residents out of their own neighborhoods. For the local folks who have some idea of what's going on, the irony of these court-ordered gang injunctions is that the most powerful, ruthless, and rapacious gang in San Francisco is glaringly absent from the City Attorney's list. The Downtown Gang (AWDG)
How does one identify members of the Downtown Gang? Well, for starters, like members of all gangs, the AWDG hang out together: at museum galas, society do's, first nighters at the opera and the symphony, parties in Pacific Heights, winter in Tahoe, and so forth. But the best way to ID them is to use the old-fashioned follow-the-money method. Pick a politician, check out the big buck contributors, and then see whether the politician's policies benefit private sector profit or the public good. It doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to find a political spear carrier for the AWDG and then the AWDG member who owns and supplies the spears. "The ‘Care Not Cash' proposition would solve the problem of homeless people by slashing monthly welfare payments from $395 to $59." A textbook example is the current mayor, Gavin Newsom. Newsom, the extremely personable shill for all things rich and white in San Francisco, pulls all the levers and pushes all the buttons that put the policies of the AWDG into motion, which include sweeping out homeless people, lowering business taxes and continuing the privatization of public housing. As a San Francisco supervisor, Newsome made his bones for the AWDG in 2002 by placing his "Care Not Cash" proposition on the ballot which would solve the problem of homeless people by slashing monthly welfare payments from $395 to $59 in return for a proposed system of "care." "Care Not Cash" would have flopped without the big buck effort behind it. The campaign for the "Care Not Cash" proposition, known to homeless advocates as "Neither Care Nor Cash," was funded by a shadowy group called SFSOS, or San Francisco SOS, which was founded by Warren Hellman, heir to the Wells Fargo fortune, Donald Fisher, the sweatshop king of the Gap/Banana Republic/Old Navy clothing empire, and Senator Diane Feinstein. Other original supporters included financial heavy hitters like Charles Schwab, William Hume, Feinstein's husband - the war profiteer, Richard Blum - and socialites like Dede Wilsey. In addition to its outright attack on the homeless, SFSOS also opposed the living wage campaign, affordable housing and tenant protection and supported re-segregation of the public schools system through charterization. SFSOS and the AWDG won big in the ensuing election. Merchants Have No Country Thomas Jefferson noted toward the end of his life that "merchants have no country," in that the merchant's first loyalty is always to profit. He could have just as readily said that the merchants have no political party either. Business loyalty to self interest rather than common interest is rife in modern American politics where corporations regularly hedge their bets by contributing to opposing candidates. Such was the situation when Supervisor Newsom ran for mayor in 2003. As Election Day neared, it became apparent that Newsom was barely ahead of his Green Party opponent, Matt Gonzalez, even though he was outspending him by a 10 to 1 margin. The possibility of a Green coming to power in San Francisco so terrified the AWDG that the gang pulled out all of the stops and flew into action, calling in celebrity Democrats like Bill Clinton and Al Gore and coughing up cash. Diane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi hit the phones. The heirs of the Getty oil fortune Republican businessmen rushed to the fore. George Shultz, a Republican flush with new found Bechtel riches from Iraq, opened his wallet, as did the heirs to the Getty oil fortune who were Newsom's original sponsors. Republicans Charles Schwab and Donald Fisher wrote checks. The Swig and Shorenstein families, real estate developers who had underwritten the activities of local Democrats for years, dialed in their dollars. "No one in the neighborhood will ever be able to live in the new housing units." And, of course, Newsom won and policies favored by the AWDG continue to flourish during his regime - like the onslaught to quickly privatize the shipyards property, regardless of the health of the residents during construction on this toxic site, or the fact that no one in the neighborhood will ever be able to live in the new housing units. In 2006, Lennar Corporation was cited multiple times for failing to monitor and control asbestos dust during the grading phase on Parcel A. Oddly enough, the project was never shut down to correct any non-compliant operations. Finally, several local African American neighborhood organizations went to City Hall this year to protest this continuing contamination and request that the City red tag the site until safety measures could be enforced. Their request fell upon deaf ears. Meanwhile, the AWDG, not content with securing a financial stranglehold on future development of public lands, continues to target existing public housing for privatization. Hunter's View and the Patron Saint of Privatization The situation at Hunter's View, a public housing project in the Hunter's Point/Bayview neighborhood with a scenic view of the Bay Bridge and the Bay, is a classic case of how politicians, developers, and financial interests work together to achieve their respective ends of power and profit at the expense of people. In 1997, a grandmother and five children burned to death in Hunter's View because the smoke detectors didn't work. A recent inspection - ten years later - found that 64% of the units still had non functioning smoke detectors and pockets of sewage bubble up in and around these rat-infested homes. Do you think City Hall rushed plumbers, carpenters and electricians out there to fix things up? Go sit in the corner if you answered in the affirmative. Here's how privatization for profit works: first) don't maintain anything, let everything deteriorate; second) throw up your hands in dismay of ever being able to repair anything with the meager public funds available; third) call in private developers and their bankers to "help out'; fourth) evict the residents because by now everything has to be torn down, and fifth) build units to buy, not to rent, that the evicted residents can't afford. "Do you think that the snail's pace rebuild of the infrastructure and return of the displaced residents of New Orleans is accidental?" When the Federal government purposely abandoned the "inner cities" of Urban America almost thirty years ago, the vacuum left in its wake created vast and lucrative investment opportunities for the exploitation of public property. Do you think that the snail's pace rebuild of the infrastructure and return of the displaced residents of New Orleans is accidental? Go sit in the corner! In San Francisco, the patron saint of privatization is Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, known to some locals as "Nancy Privatisi" for her landmark work in taking the 1,200 acres of public land in the Presidio and placing it into private hands. Even the staid San Francisco Chronicle couldn't avoid noting that the Presidio was "the first privatized national park in the United States." How about a little Q and A? Who was one of the founding directors of the Presidio Trust? Donald Fisher. Who appointed him? Bill Clinton. Who is a major contributor to Pelosi's campaign, while at the same time being a charter member of the SFSOS, the AWDG and the Republican Party? Donald Fisher. Who's going to construct a museum to himself - excuse me - for his art collection, in the Presidio? Donald Fisher. Who supports it? Nancy Pelosi. There's also a plan to put a Walt Disney museum in the Presidio which would be appropriate because Nancy's husband, Paul, owns a bit of Disney. A local union organizer suggested that it would be fitting that a third museum be erected between the first two museums-a museum to sweatshop workers. "The patron saint of privatization is Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi." Getting back to Hunter's View, Newsom has been seen cruising the neighborhood with developers from the AWDG. Hunter's View is a perfect candidate for privatization: it has a view that yuppies will pay big bucks for, and it's sufficiently destabilized to warrant complete leveling. Hunter's Point resident Appolonia Jordan, in a recent article in the Black-owned San Francisco Bayview newspaper, wrote, "I know you have noticed the groups of clean, pressed suited white men who jump out of these brand new SUVs with Mayor Gavin Newsom looking around your housing project. They smile and sometimes even talk to the ‘poor' children playing outside." In response to a Chronicle series about the dire living situation at Hunter's View, Pelosi, whose nephew Laurence has worked for both Lennar and Newsom, announced that the Democrats had not only increased funding for public housing, but that their $1 million allotment for Hunter's View would create "one-for-one replacement of 267 public housing units" with "new affordable rental units," and "market rate homes." Sounds familiar. Sounds like Lennar's original plan for the shipyards. Sounds like the Fillmore. Don Santina is a cultural historian and third generation San Franciscan who received a 2005 Superior Scribing Award for his Black Commentator article, "Reparations for the Blues." He recently appeared in a Canadian Sportsnet TV feature on racism and baseball with Danny Glover and Barry Bonds. He can be reached at ' ); document.write( addy39367 ); document.write( '\n lindey89@aol.com. This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it |
| From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images |
|
There can be no doubt that much Hip Hop product is pathological. But who's product is it? Industry activist Lisa Fager went to Capitol Hill to school lawmakers on the real purveyors of audio and video mayhem: the music and communications corporations that control the destructive content that saturates the market. Pathology is not limited to musical product; it oozes into the public discourse in the form of racist speech and images that defame the powerless - all for the sake of corporate profit margins. Under relentless media consolidation, music playlists have become uniform indicators of massive payola - "an organized corporate crime." From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Imagesby Lisa Fager "Media conglomerates are the gatekeepers of content." The following is testimony prepared by Lisa Fager of Industryears for Congressional Hearings on Hip Hop. It was first published in Davey D's Hip Hop Corner. Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images. My name is Lisa Fager Bediako, and I am the President and co-founder of Industry Ears. My testimony today will focus on the following: 1) the fallout following the Imus incident, including the identity of the real culprits, and their roles in perpetuating stereotypes; 2) the disproportionate impact of negative media on the African American community; 3) the beneficiaries of negative and stereotypical media messages; and finally, some Industry Ears recommendations to address these problems. "The ‘Imus Incident' has created strange bedfellows." The now-infamous "Imus Incident" is intriguing in that it has created strange bedfellows: it has unified both conservative and liberal media in invoking Hip Hop music as the veritable poster child of all that is wrong with society. That is, a popular argument made in the throes of Imus' oft-repeated "nappy-headed hoes" comment is that such language pales in comparison to the content of most commercialized Hip Hop music. The idea is that if radio stations and Viacom music channels can play the "bitch, ho, nigga" content of gangsta rappers, then what is so bad about Imus' comment? If the Black community apparently accepts such language from its own, then why get upset when Don Imus says it? It is easy for me to understand why Black folk would be in an uproar over a White man referring to young Black women as "nappy headed hoes" on a nationally syndicated radio show; as a Black woman, that part should be intuitive. However, what appears to be more difficult to understand - especially to our friends in the news media - is that there exists a large cadre of individuals and organizations that represent communities of color that also are in an uproar when media permits content that is degrading to women and people of color to be broadcast. Note that, unlike the conservative and liberal media hypes, our concern is not simplistically directed at the artists who produce such material; our concern is also directed towards the record labels, radio stations, and music video channels (i.e., the corporations) that are profiting from allowing such material to air. "Our concern is also directed towards the record labels, radio stations, and music video channels (i.e., the corporations) that are profiting from allowing such material to air." For example, during the week in which Imus was suspended and subsequently fired by CBS, I was called by three national news outlets to speak about the hip hop music issue. However, each outlet only wanted me to defend the commercialized Hip Hop industry; no one was interested in the fact that I also agreed that "bad" content applies across the board and should also be dealt with. The message is clear: If you do not fit the "role" media has created for ratings you lose your opportunity to be heard. "CBS fired Imus only when corporate sponsors started to pull out." Freedom of speech has been spun by industry conglomerates to mean the b-word, n-word and ho while censoring and eliminating Hip Hop music that discusses Hurricane Katrina, the Iraq War, Jena 6, dangers of gun violence and drugs and songs that contains words like "George Bush" and "Free Mumia." "Payola is now an organized corporate crime that supports the lack of balanced content and demeaning imagery with no consequences." All over the country you have identical playlists from station to station no matter what the radio format and it's no coincidence. Payola is no longer the local DJ receiving a couple dollars for airplay; it is now an organized corporate crime that supports the lack of balanced content and demeaning imagery with no consequences. Broadcaster claims that this is what listeners want to hear is not honest. Radio stations only research the songs that are currently being played on the radio (i.e. songs that are paid for). New artists with new songs do not get tested. This explains the identical playlists and the exclusion of local and regional artist airplay on radio stations. Stereotypes and degrading images in both radio and television disproportionately impact the African American community. There are a wealth of shows on networks like Viacom that capitalize and profit from demeaning women and black people, including the following examples: "Yo Momma" pits teens against each other to yell disrespecting and sometimes racist insults, and "We Can Do Better," aka a "Hot Ghetto Mess," demeans and makes fun of every day people all in the name of entertainment. The cumulative effect suggests to the targeted audience that this is the way things are and how they should act. "'We Can Do Better,' aka a ‘Hot Ghetto Mess,' demeans and makes fun of every day people all in the name of entertainment." A good example of records, radio and corporate partnerships includes a song on Virgin Records label called, "Ms. New Booty." This song, performed by a white rapper was silly and tasteless, but the promotion by the record label and partnership with "Girls Gone Wild" was truly offensive. A local Washington DC DJ at 5pm promoted the tune by suggesting he likes to visit the MsNewBooty.com website to masturbate. The website, created by Virgin Records, asked girls to enter a contest for the "best new booty." Girls were required to take photos of their butts and post them online. Each week people would vote for the best "booty" of the week with the winner receiving a chance to be in a music video. "African American children listen and watch more radio and television than any other demographic." In the documentary, Hip Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes, a group of white teens are asked what they think about Hip Hop. They explained, "Hip Hop gives a better insight into black culture and what its like to grow up in the ghetto," as if all black people had the same experience. Lisa Fager can be contacted through the IndustryEars website, or at ' ); document.write( addy_text53766 ); document.write( '\n Lisa@industryears.com This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it |